Permission to go outside
On a different part of the planet:
One of four women who was recently subjected to a brutal public lashing by armed Taliban fighters in Afghanistan has spoken about her experience, amid an increase of violent punishments given to those violating its strict interpretation of religious law.
Aziza, who like many other Afghan women only uses one name, was rounded up by the Taliban’s shadow police for being out of her house without her husband and not being fully veiled. She was beaten so badly she lost consciousness.
Not punishments and not any kind of police, just a group of criminal men committing extreme violence against a woman.
Aziza said she was arrested by armed Taliban fighters after they entered a local market. She was wearing a burqa without mesh covering her face.
“Women in our area have no identity and they are considered incomplete without men. Sometimes men are not available and many women died in the remote areas as they were unable to reach hospital,” she said.
Not only are they considered incomplete without men, they’re violently assaulted for being outside without men.
Describing the incident, Aziza said: “There was a rush in the market when suddenly the Taliban came. Everyone tried to run away but I was unable to escape and they came and asked why I was not wearing a veil with a face mesh.”
She said she lost consciousness during the flogging and that no one came to help her.
“I am afraid of the Taliban now and feel they will be more violent against women. I am still unable to get over what happened.
“The Taliban teach us about our roles under sharia. They told us to serve our husbands with food and roles in the kitchen, and that you don’t have permission to go outside for shopping or to the doctor without a mahram [male guardian]. This is not the way to treat women.”
No it is not.
I hope you’re going to file this under the category of “cis privilege.”
She must have missed the part about how empowering the veil is.
Don’t the men know that those women don’t identify as being subject to the rules of femaleness??
@1,2,3: Wrong, wrong, wrong.
The right to be abused is a matter of religious freedom. Anything else just has to be Islamophobia. Surely. Isn’t it?
So consider that serious misunderstanding sorted out. Now, where was I…?
And let’s all take a break so we can fume against Israel until the subject is forgotten.