If her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it
Now the woman who said Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her when they were both teenagers has gone public – with great reluctance.
Earlier this summer, Christine Blasey Ford wrote a confidential letter to a senior Democratic lawmaker alleging that Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her more than three decades ago, when they were high school students in suburban Maryland. Since Wednesday, she has watched as that bare-bones version of her story became public without her name or her consent, drawing a blanket denial from Kavanaugh and roiling a nomination that just days ago seemed all but certain to succeed.
Now, Ford has decided that if her story is going to be told, she wants to be the one to tell it.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Ford said that one summer in the early 1980s, Kavanaugh and a friend — both “stumbling drunk,” Ford alleges — corralled her into a bedroom during a gathering of teenagers at a house in Montgomery County.
While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
She was able to get away when the drunk friend jumped on top of both of them.
She didn’t talk about it in detail until she told a therapist about it in 2012; the therapist took notes.
The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
And a girls’ soccer coach at another elitist school, this time a Catholic school in DC.
Reached by email Sunday, Judge declined to comment. In an interview Friday with The Weekly Standard, before Ford’s name was known, he denied that any such incident occurred. “It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,” Judge said. He told the New York Times that Kavanaugh was a “brilliant student” who loved sports and was not “into anything crazy or illegal.”
Oh, he loved sports, well that changes everything – popular male athletes never assault women.
Christine Ford is a professor at Palo Alto University who teaches in a consortium with Stanford University, training graduate students in clinical psychology. Her work has been widely published in academic journals.
So…did a sports-loving teenage boy get drunk and assault a teenage girl at a drunken party? Or did a 51-year-old professor of clinical psychology tell a whopper about him, after carefully laying the groundwork for it in therapy six years ago?
For weeks, Ford declined to speak to The Post on the record as she grappled with concerns about what going public would mean for her and her family — and what she said was her duty as a citizen to tell the story.
She engaged Debra Katz, a Washington lawyer known for her work on sexual harassment cases. On the advice of Katz, who believed Ford would be attacked as a liar if she came forward, Ford took a polygraph test administered by a former FBI agent in early August. The results, which Katz provided to The Post, concluded that Ford was being truthful when she said a statement summarizing her allegations was accurate.
By late August, Ford had decided not to come forward, calculating that doing so would upend her life and probably would not affect Kavanaugh’s confirmation. “Why suffer through the annihilation if it’s not going to matter?” she said.
But bits of the story leaked anyway, and reporters started contacting her.
On Friday, the New Yorker reported the letter’s contents but did not reveal Ford’s identity. Soon after, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) released a letter from 65 women who say they knew Kavanaugh when he attended high school from 1979 to 1983 at Georgetown Prep, an all-boys school in North Bethesda.
“Through the more than 35 years we have known him, Brett has stood out for his friendship, character, and integrity,” the women wrote. “In particular, he has always treated women with decency and respect. That was true when he was in high school, and it has remained true to this day.”
Skeptical people have been pointing out what a striking bit of luck it is that Grassley had that letter handy, almost as if he’d known all along that he might need it.
As the story snowballed, Ford said, she heard people repeating inaccuracies about her and, with the visits from reporters, felt her privacy being chipped away. Her calculation changed.
“These are all the ills that I was trying to avoid,” she said, explaining her decision to come forward. “Now I feel like my civic responsibility is outweighing my anguish and terror about retaliation.”
Which is heartbreaking. She shouldn’t be in that position.
We’ve been here before you know; Anita Hill. I watched that whole thing, riveted and enraged. It was utterly disgusting.
She married her husband in 2002. Early in their relationship, she told him she had been a victim of physical abuse, he said. A decade later, he learned the details of that alleged abuse when the therapist asked her to tell the story, he said.
He said he expects that some people, upon hearing his wife’s account, will believe that Kavanaugh’s high school behavior has no bearing upon his fitness for the nation’s high court. He disagrees.
“I think you look to judges to be the arbiters of right and wrong,” Russell Ford said. “If they don’t have a moral code of their own to determine right from wrong, then that’s a problem. So I think it’s relevant. Supreme Court nominees should be held to a higher standard.”
There’s more to it than that. There’s the specific issue of putting men on the court who see women as public property rather than human beings like themselves.
And if he did it once, the probability he did it again approaches 1.
Vis a vis Anita Hill – Joe Biden should be reminded of his own complicity every time he talks about running for president. OT I know but I’m tired of hearing how he thinks if he’d run in 2016 he would have been the nominee instead of Hillary and would totally have beaten Trump. In fact, I’m sick of old white guys in general, telling everyone how awesome they are at everything.
I’m absolutely certain that the probability of his defenders constantly using the phrase ‘if he did’ followed by ‘mere teenage indiscretion’ is 1. I’d also wager that ‘no harm done’ will factor heavily.
Such is the state of partisanship among Republicans at the moment I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he was confirmed to SCOTUS. Disgusted, but not surprised at all.
Oh god. It’s already happening. Post to follow.
Claire – I know. What Biden did was unforgivable, yet it pretty much got buried.
Holy shit!
If anybody wants next weeks lottery numbers…..
I’m glad she came forward, and, I hate to say it, I’m glad she’s a successful person so she can’t easily be characterized as a crazed liar.
I hope things don’t go as badly for her as she feared. I honestly think they might not. Sure, the MAGA morons on twitter will be merciless, but those idiots can be ignored. I don’t think it’s likely to impact her career or friendships. Things have changed for the better in that regard (but still not as much as they need to).
So Kavanaugh and Judge apparently in high school were blackout drunks. A lot of young people do stupid stuff like that. But what kind of horrible people trap a woman in a room and then laugh as one of them sexually assaults and attempts to rape her? What entitled monsters.
Glad you added ‘easily’, because you know it’ll come anyway. Hysterical woman, crazy bitch, tool of the liberal left, yada yada yada.
Following on from my comment #5, I’d declare 2-for-2, but it was just too bloody obvious.
http://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2018/gearing-up-to-punish-the-slut/
ps. Ophelia, thank you for editing out my mess-ups in recent comments.
#7, everyone can be accused of being a crazed liar.
And, unfortunately, there are crazed liars. A lot of them.
And defenders of almost any side will accuse accusers of being crazed liars. As alluded to with respect to Biden, Democrats did this as well, with the infamous, disgraceful “nuts and sluts” defense supporting Clinton against his accusers.
I’m sorry for what Ms. Ford is having to go through, but, taking it as a given that this horrible story is true, I am also glad she is in a position where it stretches credulity she is doing this for any other reason than she wants to get the truth out.
If some random, down-on-their luck person had made these claims, it would be easy to suggest they wanted celebrity or money. Maybe that would be true, or maybe it would be horribly unfair, but those aspersions could be plausibly made.
Instead, we have a college professor, married since 2002, who in counseling sessions in 2012 related a story of being assaulted in 1982 by someone from a nearby college. Now she claims it was Kavanaugh, who went to a nearby college.
To believe she’s lying, we’d have to believe that she laid the groundwork for this in 2012, gambling that someone would come along to fit the bill, or we have to believe she was attacked by someone else that she didn’t name and is choosing to now blame it on Kavanaugh for political reasons. Or…well, how implausible need we get? I believe we’ve already crossed the line.
So…I’m glad the accuser is someone in a strong position, harder to discredit, and more likely to recover from the counterattack of partisan morons.
As a side note, I was getting annoyed at the “Ms” styling rather than “Dr” but then I realized with some digging that it looks like she doesn’t use Ford as her professional name but instead uses Blasey. Not an unusual choice for married professional women in science, but confuses the issue in terms of which title to use, since she may well prefer Ms Ford in her personal life.
I’m not blaming her for that, just an observation, but I was concerned it was a way of taking her down a peg and now I’m not so sure. I can get mad when people use Ms/Miss/Mrs when I’ve already informed them my title is Dr and I guess I projected. :-/
Claire, I wouldn’t be surprised if it is a way to diminish her. I find that people in my school will “Dr” the men to death, but rarely use anything but first names to refer to the women, even when the women have higher levels of education. The title “Dr” makes her sound like she might have some stable, serious side that allowed her to complete an entire college program from bottom to top, and if you are stable and serious, it’s harder to portray you as “hysterical”. “Hysterical” and “Dr” don’t seem to go together in most people’s minds (unless you talk about Dr. Demento).