Guest post: Getting the job versus doing the job
Originally a comment by Bruce Gorton on The narcissists won long ago.
The thing that gets me with this research is it always looks at getting the job as an end unto itself.
So you have narcissists are very good at becoming CEOs – but you don’t really have them being good at being CEOs.
I mean if you look at Trump objectively so far his results are booming oil prices, North Korea making a fool of the US, war crimes on the border, increased tensions with Canada and Mexico stifling trade with both countries, and you have examples such as Harley Davidson opening factories elsewhere because his trade tariffs had the predicted result.
If he continues, as I believe he will, in the vein of Jacob Zuma, you can expect at a point for there to be massive revelations around state capture. There are already Bell Pottinger style operations dedicated to running distraction tactics to claim the MSM are in a conspiracy to make him look bad.
Sure he got the job, but how’s he actually done at doing it? How do any of these narcissists actually do and doing the job they so successfully got? Isn’t that kind important?
Because if they’re very good at getting the job, but not very good at doing it, well that doesn’t sound to me like we should be encouraging narcissism, that sounds to me like we should be re-looking at how we pick people for those jobs.
Are those results REALLY what he was ‘hired’ for?
Seems to me the GOP has worked very hard at cobbling together a coalition of racists, misogynists, apocalyptic ‘christians’, anti-regulation reactionaries, self centered rich folk (and the corporations they run), and a variety of un-classified ‘deporables’ who have spent the last 20-years or so listening to nothing but talk-radio and Fox News. Seems to me, he’s doing a darned good job for THEM.