He went to the best colleges, or college
After Dim Donald’s shy confession of genius on Twitter this morning he expanded on his explanation to reporters.
Elaborating during a meeting with reporters at Camp David later in the day, Mr. Trump again ticked off what he called a high-achieving academic and career record. He raised the matter “only because I went to the best colleges, or college,” he said. Referring to a new book citing concerns about his fitness, he said, “I consider it a work of fiction and I consider it a disgrace.”
Translation: I hate it I hate it I hate it.
The president’s engagement on the issue is likely to fuel the long-simmering argument about his state of mind that has roiled the political and psychiatric worlds and thrust the country into uncharted territory. Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation to force the president to submit to psychological evaluation. Mental health professionals have signed a petition calling for his removal from office. Others call armchair diagnoses a dangerous precedent or even a cover for partisan attacks.
What are we supposed to do, ignore how abnormal and crazed and unbefitting a head of state his behavior is? Seeing as how he can start a nuclear war, that would be grotesquely irresponsible. If his brain is melting as we watch, we need to know about it.
In the past week alone, a new book resurfaced previously reported concerns among the president’s own advisers about his fitness for office, the question of his mental state came up at two White House briefings and the secretary of state was asked if Mr. Trump was mentally fit. After the president boasted that his “nuclear button” was bigger than Kim Jong-un’s in North Korea, Richard W. Painter, a former adviser to President George W. Bush, described the claim as proof that Mr. Trump is “psychologically unfit” and should have his powers transferred to Vice President Mike Pence under the Constitution’s 25th Amendment.
Mr. Trump’s self-absorption, impulsiveness, lack of empathy, obsessive focus on slights, tenuous grasp of facts and penchant for sometimes far-fetched conspiracy theories have generated endless op-ed columns, magazine articles, books, professional panel discussions and cable television speculation.
And that’s not even an exhaustive list of what’s wrong with him.
Still, in private, advisers to the president have at times expressed concerns. In private conversations over the last year, people who were new to Mr. Trump in the White House, which was most of the West Wing staff, have tried to process the president’s speaking style, his temper, his disinterest in formal briefings, his obsession with physical appearances and his concern about the theatrics and excitement of his job.
And that’s still not an exhaustive list. So far they haven’t mentioned the relentless bullying, for instance.
“These amateurs shouldn’t be diagnosing at a distance, and they don’t know what they’re talking about,” said Allen Frances, a former psychiatry department chairman at Duke University School of Medicine who helped develop the profession’s diagnostic standards for mental disorders.
Dr. Frances, author of “Twilight of American Sanity: A Psychiatrist Analyzes the Age of Trump,” said the president’s bad behavior should not be blamed on mental illness. “He is definitely unstable,” Dr. Frances said. “He is definitely impulsive. He is world-class narcissistic not just for our day but for the ages. You can’t say enough about how incompetent and unqualified he is to be leader of the free world. But that does not make him mentally ill.”
No, it makes him a shit.
“[W]orld-class narcissistic not just for our day but for the ages” may not be mentally ill, by a professional definition, but it’s pretty easily unfit by any reasonable political one.
“No, it makes him a shit.”
You can say that again. But now the big question: Is he a re-electable shit?
And how is he likely to behave if he becomes so sufficiently un-reelecable that he even realises it himself?
This IMHO has global implications.
He’s not re-electable if he keeps running against Hillary… Would he be confused if she wasn’t on the debate stage?
The President’s boast that his “nuclear button” was bigger than Kim Jong-un’s in North Korea motivated Elizabeth Renzetti’s editorial today. Quoting in part,
“Beatrice Fihn won Nobel Peace Prize 2017 for shepherding a nuclear-ban treaty through the United Nations. The nuclear-ban treaty is also feminist; I’d argue that it was one of the greatest feminist achievements of the past year. … The treaty goes on to emphasize that women must play an equal role in disarmament strategy. … Carol Cohn wrote with wonder about her colleagues, a group of male nuclear strategists who spoke in lovingly erotic terms about missiles and thrust ratios, but derided any mention of peace work as ‘soft-headed’ and unintellectual.”
Elizabeth Renzetti, “Fingers off the buttons, boys: Women’s voices are crucial to the prevention of nuclear war”, The Globe and Mail, Jan. 6, 2018, p. O2
Nuclear weapons are not only erotic but spiritual.
From a letter of Jean Weigle, University of Geneva Physics Institute, Aug. 15, 1945 to K. K. Darrow, secretary of the American Physical Society: “The papers talk about a diabolical invention…. They do not see that it is the most marvelous realization of a spiritual search, of the most spiritual work which has gone on for centuries in physics. ….now with the Uranium Machine (what a sadness to call it a bomb) America has once more given us hope: made us see that now man could be great … like little gods since we can make stars.”
S S Schweber, Preliminary Quantum Field Theory, 1938 – 1952, in B S DeWitt and R Stora, Eds., Les Houches, Series XL, 27 June to 4 Aug, 1983, Relativity, Group Theory and Topology II, North-Holland, 1984.