The end of “women”
There’s a piece by Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha about emotional labor. The title is
A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR A FAIR TRADE EMOTIONAL LABOR ECONOMY
(CENTERED BY DISABLED, FEMME OF COLOR, WORKING CLASS/POOR GENIUS)
I have no idea what the second line, the one in parentheses, is supposed to mean.
Whatever it’s supposed to mean, I’m staggered before the piece even begins, by a throat-clearing that prefaces it:
Editor’s note: In this piece you may notice some departures from Bitch’s house style. This piece was edited according to the author’s specifications.
Femme: A person who has one of a million kinds of queer femme or feminine genders. Part of a multiverse of femme gendered people who have histories and communities in every culture since the dawn of time. A queer gender that often breaks away from white, able bodied, upper middle class, cis ideas of femininity, remixing it to harken to fat or working class or Black or brown or trans or non-binary or disabled or sex worker or other genders of femme to grant strength, vulnerability and power to the person embodying them. A revolutionary gender universe.
In other words…a person who for some reason thinks the word “woman” is some kind of obscenity or blasphemy or admission of guilt, and is therefore to be shunned…in favor of the word “woman” in another language. That’ll fix it.
But French – my dear, isn’t that terribly elitist? It’s only snobby people who sip their lattes in coastal bubbles who know French. Surely it should be mujer.
But more to the point – fuck that.
I’m so sick of this constant drip-drip-drip insistence that actually women have to be kicked out of feminism now because women are not oppressed at all but rather the source of oppression, because they’re such white cis able-bodied upper middle class bitches. There’s no such thing as “femme gendered people” who are a category apart from women, and being fat or working class or black or brown does not make you not a woman. I’m so sick of this stupid malevolent woman-hating bullshit. There is no “revolutionary gender universe” that excludes women – that right there is just plain old vanilla patriarchy, and I say the hell with it.
But she goes with it. Everything is femme.
The thing about being a working class or poor and/or disabled and/or parenting and/or Black, Indigenous or brown femme is that people are going to ask you to do stuff for them. Oh, are they ever…And because: your life as a working class or poor and/or sex working and/or disabled and/or Black or brown femme person has taught you that the only damn way you or anybody survives is by helping each other…It’s maybe what hippies mean when they talk about the gift economy, it’s just a million times more working class, femme, Black and brown, and sick in bed.
Do not say women; never say women; women are the enemy.
We live in a white capitalist colonialist cissexist ableist patriarchy that oppresses in many ways, including by reviling all that is femme. In the queer communities I’ve been part of since the ’90s, I’ve witnessed how femmephobia, sexism, and transmisogyny act together to view femininity and femmeness as weak, less than, not as smart or competent, “hysterical,” “too much,” not worthy of praise or respect, enforcing rape culture and political, economic and social disenfranchisement of femmes. Forget femme invisibility; the thing most femmes I know are impacted by is lack of femme respect. Femmephobia and transmisogyny infuse queer and mainstream cultures in a million ways, from the ways in which femme genders are seen as inherently less radical (i.e., assuming money spent on makeup or femme clothing is somehow more capitalist than that spent on bowties and butch wax) to the ways in which, as writer Morgan M. Page notes, “Any minor slip of language or politics and [trans women] are labeled “crazy trans women,” resulting in trans women being expelled from queer communities.
Yeah. It’s all femmephobia and transmisogyny; no sexism or misogyny at all. Women are shit; it’s only femmes that are any good.
Generations of femmes have written and organized about misogyny and transmisogyny in queer and trans communities, and I’m alive because of this work. But I remain, with many other femme/feminine people, harmed by misogynist ideas about care labor, where endless free emotional labor is simply the role our communities have for femme and feminine people. As a newly physically disabled, working class femme of color in the ’90s, I often felt how the queer and prison justice communities I was part of looked down on my gender, especially when I was sick and broke and surviving abuse and needing support. Then I really sucked—I was just another needy, weak girl, huh? The one place femme people could receive respect in those communities was if we were tough, invulnerable, always “on,” and never needing a thing.
And if they carefully said “femme” instead of “women” because…no, I still don’t know why. To be better than those bitches, clearly, but why she sees that as somehow an advance on feminism I do not know.
It seems like the first step in constructing a radical feminism in the last few decades has been deciding, above all else, which portion of womankind has to be thrown under the bus – after that, it’s all citations and back-patting in journals and publications with a half dozen readers and some glorious revolution that no one outside those half dozen readers will ever so much as notice.
So, if a person is white, cis-hetero, able-bodied, middle class, and woman, said person will not be asked to perform emotional labor? Or to “do things” for people? Or is it just that we should just do it, and shut up? (And I’m not totally sure if I qualify, anyway. Able-bodied seems to suggest that you can use your arms fully, which I cannot because of my shoulder replacements. And I grew up outside the middle class and moved into it by my own efforts, so does that change my gender identification now? I’m so confused!)
Poe? I mean calling it “a modest proposal” does sound like its supposed to be a satire, but…
#3
Surely Swift.
It doesn’t seem to require any effort at all to declare inconvenient people, like actual women, to be Monsters of Privilege, opwessing whoever is posting their current whinge.
Meanwhile Donald Trump is President, Jeff Sessions is Attorney General, Betsy DeVos is head of the DoE (aha, there’s a woman oppressor! :P)…
Isn’t it time to shit on straight, rich, white *men*?
Yeah… I’m a fat white women (but very well loved….) who is also working class. Do I count? Do I have to be feminine to be femme? I’m mostly not very feminine. But not completely not. It’s all a bit beyond me.
I do know that as a woman I have been expected to perform both emotional and reproductive labour, to a far greater extent than the men in my class. But that obviously doesn’t count.
Blood Knight – nooooo – that’s so Second Wave and hideous. No, it’s time to shit on women, because it’s been all their fault this whole time.
This article ould be entirely rewritten with women / woman / female in place of ‘femme’, and it would be a pretty robust endorsement of feminism. As it is, it makes most of the same points as the source material but with a baffling rejection of the female sex.
I notice that the author of this piece capitalises black but not brown, as though brown skin (which is actually the colour of most black people anyway) makes one inferior to black. One assumes that the author would scream to the rooftops if somebody else wrote a piece wherin white was capitalised but not black or brown.
Eliminating women and racist to boot.
I saw this tweet from Mark Hoppus, primarily about the new Doctor, but the last few items seemed relevant here. (Forgive me, I don’t know how to embed a tweet.) It’s making the rounds as a meme.
https://twitter.com/markhoppus/status/886610594329178112
There’s a few laughs in that twitter feed. I don’t think he was the first, or only, person to come up with that line either. The internet is so recursive it’s hard to be sure.