Simply oblivious
David Brooks (“not always wrong”) on the moral vacuum of Trumps:
The Donald Trump Jr. we see through the Russia scandal story is not malevolent: He seems to be simply oblivious to the idea that ethical concerns could possibly play a role in everyday life. When the Russian government offer came across his email, there doesn’t seem to have been a flicker of concern. Instead, he replied with that tone of simple bro glee that we remember from other scandals.
“Can you smell money?!?!?!?!” Jack Abramoff emailed a co-conspirator during his lobbying and casino fraud shenanigans. That’s the same tone as Don Jr.’s “I love it” when offered a chance to conspire with a hostile power. A person capable of this instant joy and enthusiasm isn’t overcoming any internal ethical hurdles. It’s just a greedy boy grabbing sweets.
And Big Don is exactly the same, as we’ve seen a million times by now.
Once the scandal broke you would think Don Jr. would have some awareness that there were ethical stakes involved. You’d think there would be some sense of embarrassment at having been caught lying so blatantly.
But in his interview with Sean Hannity he appeared incapable of even entertaining any moral consideration. “That’s what we do in business,” the younger Trump said. “If there’s information out there, you want it.” As William Saletan pointed out in Slate, Don Jr. doesn’t seem to possess the internal qualities necessary to consider the possibility that he could have done anything wrong.
That to me is the central takeaway of this week’s revelations. It’s not that the Russia scandal may bring down the administration. It’s that over the past few generations the Trump family has built an enveloping culture that is beyond good and evil.
The Trumps have an ethic of loyalty to one another. “They can’t stand that we are extremely close and will ALWAYS support each other,” Eric Trump tweeted this week. But beyond that there is no attachment to any external moral truth or ethical code. There is just naked capitalism.
It’s the central takeaway, but it’s not new. We see it in Ivanka, we see it in Jared, we see it in all of them. They’re morally empty.
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1600590773292711/?type=3&theater
The Augustus Gloop moral model.
No. We can’t stand it that Donald Trump is responsible to the American public that (stupidly) elected him president, and he doesn’t understand that. This isn’t about loyalty to family. Most of us can stand, and understand, loyalty to family. What we can’t stand is that they are disloyal to the job they insisted on having, the country they insisted on leading, and the moral and ethical responsibility they insisted on assuming.
Their idea of family loyalty seems awfully similar to the Mafia.
Certainly the cretin in the Whitehouse appears much more like a Mafia boss than either a president or a CEO. If the US or the world in general gets through this madness, I hope this is an object lesson in the dangers of under regulated business. Got to wonder how many good ethical business people have been squeezed out by the ruthless ethos. Societies like organisms evolve to survive in the environment they find themselves. In a dog eats dog culture the top dog will unsurprisingly be a rabid cur.
This has always seemed like common bloody sense to me, but it appears not. I am amazed by how many people think that those who attain great power (wealth is a means) are automatically deserving. Indeed in socially retarded nations like the US, many regard them as chosen by god.