Plough it up and sow ashes

Trump ignoring a judge’s ruling again.

Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday that “restoration work will begin” on 15 November to a historic public golf course in Washington DC despite a federal judge’s court order to pause his plans over environmental and historic preservation concerns.

US district judge Ana Reyes had ruled earlier this year that the federal government must give notice before any substantive construction work on the East Potomac golf course could proceed, and last week issued an order halting the removal of trees at the site, which she called “inexcusable”.

Trump said Sunday in a post on Truth Social that work on the golf course would begin on 15 November and that ⁠it would reopen in about 15 months. He wrote that the facility would be transformed into “one of the Best and Most Spectacular Golf Courses anywhere in the World”. Trump did not acknowledge the legal fight in his post, which included an artist’s rendering for the course redesign.

The judge in the case took notice of Trump’s online message and ordered the government to notify her by 8pm ET on Sunday whether its position had changed from a court filing Friday that said “at most” Trump has given “preliminary thought” to the rebuilding plan and “there is no final agency action”.

He hates the golf course as it is because it’s public. Public is not glamorous! Public is not shiny gold! Public is yuck! Except of course when it’s a bunch of people cheering for Trump.

The renovation is among a number of projects Trump was pursuing to reshape ‌the White House and ‌other Washington landmarks. Many of his projects, including plans for a huge ballroom at the White House, the installation of his own name on the Kennedy Center and construction of a massive arch, have been challenged in courts.

The 106-year-old park and golf course, alone, has been the subject of many emergency hearings as the president has sought to renovate it. While it has been open to Washingtonians of all income levels, opponents of Trump’s plans to turn it into a high-end course have argued it will alter the character of the space and make it less affordable to people.

Right, so it will keep the ooky ordinary people out.

Reyes has also ordered key members of the Republican administration to testify on the recent tree-cutting and whether those actions are tied to the president’s plans for the historical public links.

On Friday, the government filed a motion to disqualify Reyes and move the case to another district judge, saying her actions had shown “deep-seated and unequivocal antipathy” and “open hostility” toward the Trump administration, according to court records. The plaintiffs in the case oppose the motion.

Give us a different judge who will give us the ruling we want. Or else.

Comments

9 responses to “Plough it up and sow ashes”

  1. Omar Avatar

    Give us a different judge who will give us the ruling we want. Or else.

    Alternatively, Americans could join the campaign to get themselves a different president. Or nothing. Because an empty White House would be a vast improvement over what it is presently full of, anyway.

  2. Julia F. Avatar

    This morning I heard a story on NPR about an attorney who jogs along the area where the trees used to be. He and several others have filed an amicus brief with the court, in which they point out that the course already had public spaces available for picnicing, walking and enjoying the trees. These areas are already in active use (well not the trees) but the new plans for the course eliminate all of these public areas.

  3. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Things like walking and enjoying the trees are incomprehensible to Trump. Might as well be in Urdu.

  4. The Whimster Gap Avatar
    The Whimster Gap

    I may alienate some of your readers here, Ophelia, but fundamentally the problem here is not Trump. Or, at least, it’s not Trump alone.

    It’s golf: an awful, boring-as-all-hell, land-hungry game, the only virtue of which is to serve as fly-paper for all the worst people in an area so that for a few hours the braying self-satisfied philistines can be kept away from the rest of the population.

    As a game for bored Scottish crofters, trying to whack a ball into divots to pass the time, then fine: it has its place, and I’d not begrudge anyone that. But golf as we know it today is a “sport” entirely built around the worldview of the kinds of people who read one book a year, and that book’s on business strategy and marketing.

    Aaaaaaaand *breathe*

  5. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Heh. I doubt anyone will be all that alienated. I for one dislike golf less than I dislike US football, probably because it’s easy to understand just by watching, which is a very feeble form of not disliking. Not that I watch it on purpose, but I occasionally happen to be near or on a golf course because of my job, and when that happens I can enjoy watching for a few minutes. I quite like the paradox of having to hit the ball really far and really precisely.

  6. Jim Baerg Avatar

    There is a golf course near to me that I like only in winter, because then it is open for X-C skiing.

  7. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    Yes, see, this is the thing about golf courses – they can also be amenities for The People, if they allow said People to use them that way. Some do, some don’t. The famous Pebble Beach course does; the municipal courses in Seattle, to my fury, do not. You’d think it would be the other way around, wouldn’t you, but it’s not.

    (There was one time I was walking employers’ dog on the famous PB course, which has spectacular views over bluffs above Carmel, and as always many golfers came up to greet the lovable dog, and a woman exclaimed “I wish we’d known, we would have brought our dog!” You’d think PB would be more snotty and exclusiony about it than Seattle, wouldn’t you, but it isn’t.)

    There’s just one course on the Monterey Peninsula that’s not owned by Pebble Beach, and it is plastered with shouty signs yelling private, get out, we’ll kill you if you put one toe on our land. Obnoxious.

    Clearly the one in DC doubles as a park with pleasing walks among trees – and Donald Trump doesn’t like that. How dare the people have pleasing walks?!

  8. twiliter Avatar

    Yeah the big shots can’t shmooze with the common folk around, they have to make it private and charge many thousands for membership. For example, the Trump owned West Palm Beach golf club reportedly costs appx. $250, 000 initiation and $25K per year. That should keep the po’ folk out.

  9. Ophelia Benson Avatar

    But there are fences or there are not. Pebble Beach is not fenced, and neither are the other PB-owned courses on the peninsula. East Potomac is not fenced. Ironically, in my view, the municipal golf courses in Seattle are fenced, and they’re policed. I tried to go for a walk on one once and was amazed to be told to get out. The guy who told me said it was a liability issue – if I got hit in the head I could sue the city blah blah. Then why does Pebble Beach take that risk? It makes no sense. I think it’s an absolutely shit policy, that shuts us out of vast expanses of parkland. East Potomac has it right, and Trump is putting a stop to that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *