Women’s march not women’s march
The UK women’s march – the one that’s incloosive of men – is today, so it’s probably happening (in multiple cities) now.
It’s pathetic how anti-feminist it is.
The Facebook group – with 21 thousand members – has a statement. Most of it is what you’d expect; the rest of it isn’t.
We are marching because reproductive rights are being removed state by state in the US making it increasingly more difficult to access safe abortions, and where vital healthcare is needed to save a woman’s life.
We are marching because discrimination and violence against trans women and girls has increased around the world. Anti-trans rhetoric prevents women from addressing the real issues they encounter by reinforcing the gender stereotypes that have oppressed women for centuries.
We are marching because women in Afghanistan under Taliban rule have been effectively silenced by being banned from speaking in public. They are no longer allowed to access education or work and are prevented from freedom of expression.
Staggering, isn’t it. Sandwiched between forced pregnancy in the US and the Taliban we get an irrelevant whine about “trans women” i.e. men.
We’re not allowed to have anything for ourselves.
The conclusion:
It’s time to march.
*Our feminism is intersectional*
Inclusivity is at the core of UK Women’s March. We acknowledge how race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability intersect. Women are exposed to racism, ageism, ableism, homophobia, and transphobia, not just sexism and misogyny. This means we must acknowledge how these differences interlock for feminism to work.
“Not just sexism and misogyny” – way to belittle your own cause.