Toddler thoughtcrime
Who knew people are required to endorse trans ideology when they don’t even know how to tie their shoelaces yet?
A toddler was suspended from nursery after being accused of being transphobic or homophobic, The Telegraph can reveal.
Department for Education (DfE) data show the child, aged either three or four, was suspended from a state school in the 2022-23 academic year for “abuse against sexual orientation and gender identity”.
Age three or four. Children that age don’t know what “sexual orientation” even is – they don’t know what “sexual” means. Nobody knows what “gender identity” is. And anyway since when are children, let alone very young children, being kicked out of school for ideological reasons?
I could see it in the case of intractable bullying of other children – boys bullying girls, white toddlers bullying brown toddlers, that kind of thing. But how could gender identity even come up? How would any toddler be motivated to bully another toddler because of “sexual orientation and gender identity”? How would any toddler know what either of those labels meant?
Maybe because they’ve watched too much BBC programming?
Helen Joyce, director of advocacy at Sex Matters, said: “Every once in a while, the extremes of gender ideology throw up a story that seems too crazy to believe, and a toddler being suspended from nursery for so-called ‘transphobia’ or homophobia is one such example.
“Worse still, this is not an isolated case. Apparently 13 four and five-year-olds were suspended or permanently excluded from school for the same reason. Teachers and school leaders involved in this insanity should be ashamed of themselves for projecting adult concepts and beliefs onto such young children.”
The teachers must be entrapping the toddlers. They must be teaching them the silly ideological vocabulary and then punishing them for using words the way toddlers do use words. “Poopyhead” becomes “tranny” or similar.
Welp, get them young. Maybe in a generation or two trans ideology will have replaced reality.
My guess is that the toddler told a blue-haired they/themmer caregiver “you’re a girl!” and would not be persuaded otherwise.
Ah yes, that would fit. Dumb of me not to think of it.
As Helen Joyce says, the people overseeing this crap should be scorchingly ashamed.
Perhaps young Nigel told young Rupert that it was impossible for Rupert to have cooties, as only girls had cooties, and young Rupert rejoined that he identified as a “cootie-haver,” so that Nigel’s assertion was transphobic.
#1 Piglet
My suspicion also, with an outside possibility they described a fellow toddler as a girl or boy and the parents thought otherwise.
Which is the real baby, the one that described a person inaccurately (for the sake of argument), or the person that took such offence? Kindy is a step towards education, and the cultist is willing to hinder that for the sake of their feelings. Where have the adults gone?
I wouldn’t doubt that both of these scenarios came into play. What a cruel way to treat children just beginning to learn about the world, who are working out the nuts and bolts of language by observing its use every day, and trying it out for themselves. Punishing them for the innocent, correct usage of pronoun rules that they’ve just started learning for themselves is unconscionable. If you don’t pass in a child’s eyes, you don’t pass. They’re not going to sugar coat the truth as they see it. If you can’t take that truth being pointed out, that’s on you, not them. How dare you take out the unmasking of your delusions on them. Shame on you.
One can only admire the brutal economy exercised by these “teachers” in combining a lesson in the application of state power, with the deliberate confusion of these children’s understanding of right and wrong, truth and lies, reality and fantasy; with the classroom versions of these values likely at odds with the teachings they are receiving at home. Mao would have been proud.
A school that flies the forced-teaming “Pride Progress” flag is one that promotes the inappropriate introduction of adult ideas that are beyond the understanding of children they are being foisted upon. Teaching anything “trans” at school is not value neutral. It can’t be. Presenting it in a classroom gives “transness” an official, civic imprimatur it does not deserve. Valorizing transness gives it a dangerous cachet and allure that can influence vulnerable, impressionable children, offering them a seemingly easy and superficially attractive shortcut to specialness that many such kids might crave. The flag betrays a disregard for reality and truth that signifies a captured institution, and advertises that a side has been taken on a contentious issue, but that this side-taking will be presented as neutral, basic, and unquestionable.
The incorporation of trans ideology into course materials will corrupt every subject it touches. Biology. History. Civics. Phys Ed. Literature. Art. But in a school setting, genderism also has an enduring, adverse effect that extends far beyond the curriculum and the classroom. Just being in the school involves indoctrination and obedience, whether one is student or staff. Thanks to captured teachers’ unions, trans identified male teachers who are allowed to “be their authentic selves” during work hours are mocking and denigrating women and girls, turning students into unwilling, captive audiences, and championing the intrusive, fetishistic sexualization of public spaces. To question or resist is “transphobic”. There’s a lesson right there.
A “trans” school will also contribute to the erosion of the rights, safety, and dignity of the girls and women within its walls, on its playgrounds, and on its sports fields. Trans “rights” always come at the expense of girls and women. Always. A school that gives trans identified boys access to facilities based on their “gender inditites” are perforce taking them away from girls. Girls will be pressured to give way to, and accept male invasion of female spaces. And what lessons are girls learning from Quisling female teachers who teach and enforce obedience and submission to trans “rights”? To be female is to be second class; resistance is futile. Step aside for Men.
Here’s silly me thinking we were moving beyond that. I’m being told to think again, to “be kind.” Or else . Fuck that shit. I guess I haven’t learned that lesson. It’s not just that I’m an old dog, but some new tricks are just too fucking stupid – and dangerous.
I confess my first reaction was “April Fools Hoax”. Not that anything is actually “too crazy to believe” these days, of course. Indeed by now I’m not sure I would survive the shock if anything sane happened…
It’s occurred to me that if Trans Sharia is imposed on these preschoolers, it will likely be the first time they have ever heard of pronouns. Going forward for them, the normal, traditional use of pronouns (i.e. a word which substitutes for a noun) will be learned after the special Trans use of pronouns (you are required to call me whatever I say you must, or you’re in trouble).
I remember when I was a kid, at some schools you could get in trouble for not saying sir or ma’am to the teachers. It’s like grammar as an exercise of power. Remember once upon a time when we thought it was a good idea to move away from that?