Only two
Where’s the joined-up argument?
In what way does feminism (aka women escaping the kitchen) depend on the belief that there are more than two “genders”?
In no way. It’s a stupid leap Bragg is making, and it’s devoid of sense.
Women have been escaping the kitchen for decades, without any help at all from trans ideology or trans activists.
Our ‘trans siblings’ are only in the front of this fight in the sense that they shove aside gays, lesbians, and women to shove themselves to the front of every argument, even in issues that have nothing to do with trans (such as feminism, gay rights, and racism). Yeah, they’re in the front line of the fight, but only in order to displace women.
…and thanks to forced teaming, are going to do their damnedest to drag everyone else in their supposed “community” into it.
Need it be mentioned that declaring “there are only two genders” is functionally equivalent to saying that a birth certificate legally makes a man female?
There are two sexes, you can pretend law changes that however you want but it’s reality.
Also, in what way do gay people depend on that belief? Pretty sure their interests are best served by dropping the idenniny nonsense.
I think this needs some explanation. Why is a biological reality functionally equivalent to a legal fiction? And I know, I know, gender vs. sex, but most people use them interchangeably, and for most people, that is how they’re going to say it. I struggle with my husband over that; he can’t accept that gender and sex are not synonymous because that’s how it’s been his whole life.