We can ignore him, but I think it’s worth noting and keeping track of how low some lifeforms will plunge.
Your first husband denies your version of events. He admits he slapped you – which is obviously totally unacceptable. But he says there was no sustained abuse. He also denies your claims he threatened to burn your Harry Potter manuscript. Only you two know what actually happened… pic.twitter.com/JV0VQHuy16
Right. Because a man who beats his wife up is going to come forward and say ‘oh, yes, I beat her up’. If we go only by what the man says, we could probably conclude there has been little to no domestic abuse throughout history. Problem solved! Domestic abuse gone away!
Idiart Wannabe gets something right in his miserable xweeting “Only you two know what actually happened -”
In other words Wannabe, you don’t have a fucking clue what happened, so piss right off. Of course, JKR is a much better writer than I so puts it far more eloquently.
No one apart from Jonathan Willoughby himself can know whether Jonathan Willoughby is experiencing a “gender identity,” nor whether this gender identity actually matches the claims he makes about it. Yet, despite these epistemological difficulties, I do believe that Willoughby finds it inadmissible for his claims to be put into question in such a fashion.
Yes, Jonathan Willyboy – side with the unrepentant wife beater, not his victim; just like the abusive man you are.
Right. Because a man who beats his wife up is going to come forward and say ‘oh, yes, I beat her up’. If we go only by what the man says, we could probably conclude there has been little to no domestic abuse throughout history. Problem solved! Domestic abuse gone away!
Idiart Wannabe gets something right in his miserable xweeting “Only you two know what actually happened -”
In other words Wannabe, you don’t have a fucking clue what happened, so piss right off. Of course, JKR is a much better writer than I so puts it far more eloquently.
No one apart from Jonathan Willoughby himself can know whether Jonathan Willoughby is experiencing a “gender identity,” nor whether this gender identity actually matches the claims he makes about it. Yet, despite these epistemological difficulties, I do believe that Willoughby finds it inadmissible for his claims to be put into question in such a fashion.
Bros before. . .
Willlougby’s ability to come out with something even more disgusting than the last disgusting thing he said is depressingly reliable.