Support
Vagueness instead of argument example #eleventy billion.
“support trans people”?
What’s that supposed to mean?
Gender skeptics don’t drop trans people or push them over or throw them off cliffs. We don’t not support trans people. What we do is decline to pretend to believe they are the sex they are not. That’s not some kind of opposite of “support.” It’s a refusal to buy into fantasy, a refusal to lie, a refusal to pretend not to know what we know.
None of this is about “support.” Trans people aren’t babies, nor are they floppy people with no bones who need to be propped up by benevolent bystanders. They’re just people who have bought into a delusion, and we’re just people who say the delusion is a delusion.
And the only science that “supports” their contentions is questionable in its methods, done by people who already have bought in to genderism.
There’s an odd juxtaposition between the tweet and the quote it contains. Hiki is a dating and friendship service specifically for people with autism, the same group that we know are preyed upon by the trans movement. I have no idea who The Pissed Off Lawyer may be but that pairing feels wrong to me.
What makes you think your opponents don’t know any people who claim to be trans? What makes you think that reading about “the science” will lead people to agree with you? For that matter, what makes you think your opponents are not well-read on the relevant topics? What makes you think you have a long history?
Why should I want to get to know a trans person? Much like the red hat wearers they’re already loudly signalling “this person is an annoying POS” without even saying a word out loud.
“Get to know a trans person.”
What does whether I know zero or n trans people have to do with my logic? If the logic stands when I know 1,000, then it stands when I know zero. If it stands at zero, then it stands at 1,000.
Again, the wrong lesson was learned from the gay rights movement. That conservatives became more open to gay rights on discovering a family member to be homosexual did not make their reasoning better. Sure, they came to the right answer, but there’s a reason your teachers made you show your work in math class. You can come to the right answer for a wrong reason, and that will mean you get the wrong answer in the future.
A completely meaningless sentence. There are no facts to be ignorant of for starters, and “transphobes” is merely a label slapped on anyone who disagrees with the trans cult agenda. Gibberish.
There is NO shame in admitting you were wrong about something in light of new information.
Now there’s an idea.
Aos #@, Pissedofflawyer is just another Idiart Wannabee whose magical trans status ensures that he understands all the medicine and science and wrote all the history books.
It’s quite fun watching him slapped down all over Xwitter.
@ BKiSA #4
Honestly, I was confused by this, as the image that came immediately to mind was the women’s socializing group, the Red Hat Society. https://redhatsociety.com/
It’s extrapolated from Jenny Joseph’s poem, whose opening lines say:
I used to see women out to lunch together in red or pink hats, wearing purple or lavender clothes.
It took a couple of minutes for that image to fade, and for me to realize who you were talking about.
Oh. Those red cap people. …
Maddog 1129: I had the same reaction, then figured out to whom it referred.
They’re more usually called red CAP wearers.
My apologies for being less than specific… for whatever reason putting MAGA in that sentence didn’t feel right.