Radioactive hair
Police in Iran shoot a woman in the spine, paralyzing her, because they don’t like her hair.
The family of Arezou Badri, a 31-year-old woman shot by Iran’s police on July 22 for allegedly violating mandatory hijab laws, is under intense government pressure to withdraw their complaint.
Badri, a mother of two, was left paralyzed after the shooting, an incident that has ignited outrage both within Iran and on the international stage.
The family’s complaint regarding Badri, who suffered severe spinal cord injuries and remains hospitalized at Valiasr Hospital in Tehran, was heard in a court this week. However, the family remains dissatisfied with the outcome and the judicial process.
This is because she has hair on her head. Women have slutty whorey seductive catch-me fuck-me hair on their heads, because they’re sluts, so if they don’t wear a huge bandage on their hair to conceal it, the cops get to shoot them. Women are so evil it’s beyond belief.
A warrant for the confiscation of Badri’s vehicle over an earlier alleged hijab violation led police to open fire from the rear driver’s side.
Say what? How could a “hijab violation,” i.e. not wearing a thick bandage on the head concealing all but the face “lead” police to open fire on the woman not wearing the bandage?
It’s all futile anyway you know. It’s not women’s fault that men think about sex a lot. If you bandage the hair it will be something else that turns the men’s thoughts to sex. If you do away with all the women you won’t have any people left. It’s a mug’s game trying to make men stop thinking about sex.
The Information Center of the Mazandaran Police Command confirmed the police shooting at the car in which Badri was a passenger, stating that the driver “continued to flee despite police orders, prompting the police to shoot at the car according to the law on the use of firearms.”
Yeah see that’s not a good reason. If the police are hassling her for existing, they don’t therefore have the right to shoot her in the back for trying to get away from them. Iranian law may allow it, but some laws suck.
She has two kids. Now their mother is paralyzed and will probably die. Because she didn’t hide her hair from lecherous men.
And this is the kind of issue that our rights-focused NGOs quailed at once gay rights were secured. Instead of looking abroad to help with the fundamental human rights denied to women around the globe, they turned themselves inside out to invent “trans rights.”
Believe it or not, back in 1953, Iran was a democracy, whose Prime Minister was the liberal Mohammad Mosaddegh. But then came the Shah (Pahlavi) installed in a coup, with eager cooperation and involvement of Britatin’s MI6, the American CIA, and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. Liberal democracy and huge deposits of oil do not sit well together. The Islamic thought police whose latest victim is Arezou Badri, are the Frankenstein Monster that also emerged through that antidemocratic poilitical process.
This is all sits inside the ME cauldron that could yet cause widespread havoc, likely starting with a nuclear exchange between Iran and Israel.
God help us all.
I should add https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh.
Omar, I think most of us know that, and if we didn’t, we should, because you mention it every time Iran comes up. I share your outrage about what happened to Mosaddegh, and have read quite a bit about the subject, but at some point, the outrage becomes merely an exercise, since being outraged about it does absolutely NOTHING to help the women of Iran. That ship has sailed. We now have to deal with the Iran that exists, and noting that this Iran was created in part by interference of western governments is noble, but doesn’t solve anything.
See
https://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2024/third-and-final-brown/#comment-3046960
https://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2024/what-should-it-be-called/#comment-3028256
https://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2022/serious-challenge/#comment-2957853
https://www.butterfliesandwheels.org/2020/thats-his-personal-opinion/#comment-2746616
Has anyone asked the organizers of World Hijab Day for comment?
Sure, paralysed, that’s bad and all, but think of the harm that has been averted! This hussy might have made a man so besotted that he had no choice but to rape her!! And then, the poor guy might have been mildly punished.
So, it all balances out in the end.
@Holms,
I’m not sure the danger has passed just because she’s paralyzed. We won’t truly be safe from her threat till she’s well dead and buried, and even then….
Might be safest to burn the witch.
I admit to recently having read the famous “Bridgerton” novels. In volume 5, when the hero finally has married the heroine and she lets her hair down, he says something like “It is good that you always wear your hair up, other wise men could not control themselves when they see you.”
So even a modern, western female author can echo sentiments like this and she (and probably most of her readers) can think them romantic.
Holms, totally correct that the blame for this lies squarely with UK and US.
And sorry , Ikanklst, it seems your only solution is more of the same.
Should the Us overthrow Iran’s current government we know from history it will impose a US friendly government and the people of Iran be damned.
Americans love to lecture us on how their senate is the worlds greatest deliberative body, how their system of government is the world’s best, and how their constitution is perfect, yet never once have they replicated that in any nation they conquered
Wtf? She didn’t say anything like that.
Rev, I don’t believe I offered a solution. I only stated that harping on something that happened 70 years ago isn’t helping the women now. I certainly didn’t say that about the senate or the constitution; I don’t believe that about either.
And I certainly didn’t propose any overthrow of any government. I am in general against doing that; it never works well.