Progressive how exactly?
When Ted Cruz gets it and the Dems don’t…
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday rejected the nomination of a progressive judge who approved the transfer of a 6’2″ transgender-identifying male child rapist to a women’s prison.
Just for the record – there is nothing “progressive” about trying to put a male rapist in a woman’s prison. If he needs protection from other men then deal with that, but not by transferring the danger to women.
Nominated by the Biden administration to join the federal bench for the Southern District of New York, Sarah Netburn allowed male sex offender July Justine Shelby to be sent to FMC Carswell, a female federal correctional facility in Fort Worth, Texas. Her order overturned the Bureau of Prisons’ rejection of his request for female housing.
What a sadistic thing to do.
Born William McClain, Shelby pleaded guilty in 1994 to molesting a nine-year-old boy and to raping a seventeen-year-old girl. After his release 18 years later, Shelby violated parole by using the internet in his apartment, landing himself in prison for another six years, until 2015. After being released again, Shelby underwent hormone therapy to begin transitioning to a female.
At the May hearing, Netburn testified that she found concerns that Shelby would sexually abuse female inmates “overblown.”
Something wrong with the arithmetic there, but anyway, seriously? Overblown? Would she like to be locked in a cell with him for a few days, see what happens?
Shelby was entered into administrative segregation recently for exposing himself to female prisoners, the Washington Free Beacon reported Wednesday.
Is that overblown?
Democratic senator Jon Ossoff broke with his party Wednesday to oppose the nomination of Netburn.
After Cruz pressed Netburn over her decision to move Shelby to live among women, current and former female inmates sounded the alarm over gender-inclusive prison housing policies in letters to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“Most incarcerated women have already experienced sexual trauma and violence during our lives,” female former inmate Amie Ichikawa wrote to the committee in a letter sent by the Independent Women’s Forum (IWF) and obtained by National Review. “We are trying to heal and prepare to be productive citizens after serving out our sentences. Having men in our prison systems disrupts all of this. We fear for our safety.”
Thank you Jon Ossoff. The rest of you Dem senators – you’re despicable.
This is no more possible than “transitioning to sheep”, or “transitioning to a bicycle” or “transitioning to antimatter.” You might as well tell us that Shelby was becoming a unicorn, or learning to become invisible, or immortal. Would a reporter present any of these other “transitions” as a realistic scenario? No. Nobody would take these examples at all seriously, because the impossibility is just so obvious that it needs no further elucidation. So why is it that “transitioning” to being female is taken seriously, and reported with a straight face? Who believes that this is possible? Why are we being lied to in this way? Because it is a lie; the impossible is being presented as a commonplace, like having a tooth filled, or a tattoo removed. This is supposed to be accepted without comment or criticism, both of which have been ruled “transphobic.” This is what happens when you corrupt language, and the people who are supposed to use it to inform us.
Drives me nuts.
Damn. I wanted to transition to antimatter.
Transitioning to bicycle seems plausible, just not while still being alive and I imagine the resulting bike might be unpleasant to ride.
#4
Read The Third Policeman by Flann O’Brien and learn all about people turning into bicycles and vice versa. It’s the mollycular theory.