Police enforce cheating
I don’t understand why this is allowed.
An Australian “trans inclusive” Premier League women’s football team with five male players has secured victory in the grand final match after dominating games throughout the summer. During the 2024 season of the North West Sydney Football Women’s Premier Competition, The Flying Bats won all 17 games and scored 76 goals while only a total of 8 points were scored against them.
Why aren’t they just banned?
The Flying Bats, a football club for “self-identified women and non-binary people,” has attracted significant criticism that has escalated over the past year.
Why was a club for women and some men allowed?
Earlier this year team was awarded a $1,000 prize after winning the North West Sydney League pre-season Beryl Ackroyd Cup, following a season of winning every game they played in the Women’s Premier League matches, 10-0. The news generated significant outcry and resulted in The Flying Bats making international headlines.
They won $1,000 by cheating. Why was it allowed?
According to regulations put forward by the North West Sydney Football Association (NWSFA), “players may register and participate on the basis of their gender identification.” There are a total of at least nine trans-identified males playing football within the women’s leagues, though their identities have been thoroughly protected and withheld by Australian media.
Well then why have women’s teams at all? Why not just say outright that women don’t get to play football any more?
Guidelines issued by the Australian Human Rights Commission state that under the federal Sex Discrimination Act 1984, sporting organizations are forbidden [to enforce] “discrimination” on the basis of a self-declared gender identity. “An example of direct discrimination would be a sporting organization refusing a trans woman’s application for membership because she is transgender,” the guidelines state.
So women can’t have women’s sports any more.
As previously revealed by Reduxx, one of the five men on the women’s football team is trans activist Riley Dennis, who was previously accused of severely injuring women while participating on another women’s team. Dennis could be seen towering over the female players during Sunday’s game, while wearing the Flying Bats uniform decorated with colors from the Pride progress flag.
Woohoo, progress!!
But wait, it gets worse.
Dennis, born Justin, 32, currently plays for The Flying Bats, but last year was a member of the Inter Lions team in New South Wales. On May 21, 2023, during a game between the Inter Lions and the St. George football clubs at the Majors Bay Reserve, Dennis launched his smaller female opponent towards a metal fence using an aggressive tackle as the two chased down the ball.
Reduxx was provided footage of the match, which showed the female player lying on her side, unmoving, as the transgender player casually walked away.
If the women object, the police turn up to threaten them.
The month prior, Dennis was said to have injured another female player, who reportedly had to seek hospital attention as a result of her injury. A letter-writing campaign was launched by Kirralie Smith, a spokeswoman with Binary Australia, encouraging concerned individuals to contact Football New South Wales, which reportedly then received over 12,000 submissions.
For her role in bringing awareness to the injuries sustained by female athletes, Smith was visited by New South Wales Police and handed an Apprehended Violence Order (AVO) on March 30 that year requiring that she neither discuss nor approach Dennis. The AVO was withdrawn by authorities in September.
It’s like some dystopian horror movie except that it’s actually happening.
Many people here might think they understand how bad this score is and consider it a comprehensive trouncing… and yet be and yet be heavily undercounting the difference here. In Australian football, there are goals, behinds and points. A goal is worth 6 points, and a behind is worth 1. Those 76 goals therefore translate to 456 points to 8, or 57 to 1.
And that’s not even the final tally. The statement “76 goals” does not include their behinds, therefore 57 to 1 is just the lower bound to the disparity!
@Holms,
They’re a regular football (aka soccer) team, not Australian Rules football.
And they averaged about 4 and a half goals a game.
Ah.
…
How to tell everyone I didn’t watch the footage without telling everyone I didn’t watch the footage… Though in my defence, the switch from points and goals threw me, and would have been better written as “…scored 76 goals while only a total of 8 were scored against them.”