Please, insult us some more
Man who gets celebrated and flattered and high office for pretending to be a woman makes a point of pretending men can be pregnant.
Tip Jar
Man who gets celebrated and flattered and high office for pretending to be a woman makes a point of pretending men can be pregnant.
I think that it would better read as
That the author of this, resident at https://bidenpros.nationaljournal.com/rachel-levine/ is also of the trans and male persuasions makes it arguably a win-win-win all round, though I notice it does not acknowledge my own coming out as a trans-giraffe.
Still, one cannot have everything, I suppose.
Let me get this straight:
According to the cult, ‘transwomen’, who are actually men who want to pretend (and who also want the rest of us to believe) that they are women, actually are women; but the words ‘woman’ and ‘women’ aren’t ever to be mentioned in regards to adult human females; just people who can be pregnant. So what, exactly, are ‘transwomen’ claiming to be, if they are the only ones allowed to use the words? No wonder not a single one of them can produce a definition.
Not that any of this is at all circular, oh no no no no no good heavens of course not.
Thank you for the laugh, Ophelia. I really needed it!
It just occurred to me that, instead of calling people who don’t believe in gods ‘atheists’, if believers started accusing us of being phobic towards them instead, it would make just as much, or as little, sense as accusing those who know that people can’t change sex of being phobic towards those who believe they can; but it would certainly give them an excuse to ‘defend their beliefs’ by pre-emptively attacking non-believers. Come to think of it, isn’t/wasn’t that the way anywhere religions hold power?
In trying to decouple “sex” from the concept of “woman,” genderists are attempting to break the female monopoly on womanhood, as if menstruation, pregnancy, childbirth, and lactation were as inconsequential to the definition of “woman” as hair colour and shoe size. They want an “expansive” definition of “woman” that has nothing to do with the biological facts of the female body, allowing their use of womanface to be sufficient qualification for entrance to what they believe to be a hatefully excluding club. They all think they’re Gregory Peck in Gentleman’s Agreement.
In their minds, the only real women are the ones who choose to be women, and work hard to “become” women. Being born female is the easy way, and shouldn’t count. It’s as if women were born into inherited wealth, and trans identified males have to work their way up, starting from the mail room. They ask “How can you deny us womanhood? We’ve earned it!”. This is part of the reversal of power relations, with women being privileged Karens, spitefully barring hardworking TiMs from their hard-earned, just reward. This isn’t male entitlement at all; it’s the story of an oppressed minority demanding justice, thwarted by a powerful, selfish, entrenched ruling class. PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MAN BEHIND THE LIPSTICK!
[…] a comment by Your Name’s not Bruce? on Please, insult us some […]