LGBT toddlers
Scottish primary schools are appointing children as “LGBT champions” and are being urged to ask pupils as young as four if they are gay, lesbian or trans, The Telegraph can reveal.
Documents show that schools are setting up LGBT clubs and “gender and sexual orientation alliance groups” for pupils as part of their membership of a scheme run by the charity LGBT Youth Scotland.
The charity, which received nearly £1 million of taxpayer’s money last year, also urges head teachers to install gender neutral toilets and mark Transgender Day of Remembrance, an event critics say is designed to reinforce myths spread by trans activists.
Wait, I have an idea. Here’s what you do: just change every child’s genitalia at birth. Boom! Problem solved – no more need for boring clubs and alliance groups and charities trying to nudge people into being Gender Special, just make everyone Gender Special from the outset and then you can focus on other things at last. Think of all the free time that suddenly opens up!
Carolyn Brown, an educational psychologist, said: “Children of primary school age are very suggestible and are still at a very early stage of their psychological and emotional development. What we are seeing here is the product placement of gender ideology in schools which is potentially very harmful. Kids in primary school cannot possibly know if they are LGBT because biologically, psychologically and emotionally they will not yet have the capacity.”
Right, so just decide it for them with the progressive genitalia switch the moment they pop out.
LGBT Youth Scotland states that it has trained more than 5,000 teachers since 2021 and that its scheme means it is “reaching a minimum of 30,000 young people” and successfully changing the “culture and ethos” of Scottish schools.
Well, that would explain a lot.
Has Hamza Yousaf been sitting in on these trainings? Is that what explains him?
Remember when “LGBT agenda” was irrational fear-mongering. Can we go back to that time, please? I really, really don’t like this feeling.
Yeah, that’s not creepy, dangerous, or wildly inappropriate at all. Teach them that they were carelessly, presumptuously, and randomly assigned a sex at birth. That should work out well.
While we’re on the whole AMAB/AFAB thing, what exactly are genderists claiming or expecting? Even if gender actually existed, IT’S INVISIBLE. Without lipstick and high heels, there are no “gender markers” for anyone to recognize in the first place. (Head tilt doesn’t count ‘cuz babies are pretty floppy in that regard until they’re strong enough to hold their noggins straight.) It’s not like the doctors, nurses or parents have anything to go by. At birth, sex is all there is. This would still be the case if “gender identities” were a real thing. When it suits them, genderists will sniff superciliously about their opponents conflating “sex” and “gender”, but are quite happy to do so themselves. This is one of those times. They make a big deal about sex supposedly being “assigned” at birth as if everyone attending had missed something obvious and had simply made a wild guess. I ask genderists, what else is there for anyone at all to see of any newborn’s “gender identity” at birth? How could anyone determine it in a preverbal child who has not exhibited any of the traits or behaviours that would alert those around them to any potential “mismatch” between their Holy Gender Essence and their negligently assigned sex? And what behaviours are there outside of sexist gender stereotypes (enjoying or doing inappropriately” “boyish” or “girlish” things)? What is this but policing and enforcing the very gender norms that trans activism claims to oppose and refute?
Even with our Scottish toddlers, the forced teaming of supposed “gender identity” with sexual orientation is going to cement that chimerical connection of T+LGB for them in later life. Never mind that it’s grotesquely inappropriate for teachers to be asking your children about sexual orientation (which will arise in due course without any confusing prompting from teachers), but introducing the whole idea of “transness” (which I do not believe can be done without resorting to patriarchal, sexist, normative stereotypes of what the presumptive “correct” preferences and behaviours for each sex are) is going to start the whole “trans away the gay” thing that much sooner, if Liking girls” is presented as part of being a boy, or “liking boys” a part of being a girl. They will be taught by indoctrinated teachers that liking the “wrong” things is not a sign of anything other than being trans, because the stereotypes are not going to be described as limits to be ignored, overcome, and discarded, but foolproof signposts to an “authentic self” as the other sex. Not to mention undermine continuing attempts to create a society free of the limitations and restrictions imposed by sexist gender stereotypes.
Scotland is fucked.
Yet another way in which it sounds like religion. Get the children to believe something before they even know there are other choices, and you’ve got ’em. That’s why religions are so desperate to get into the public schools; it’s why trans has been so desperate to get into all the schools. Both have way too much success.
“Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man.”
I’ve got a proposal that will save you all those genitalia swaps, Ophelia: instead of swapping genitals, simply announce “it’s a boy!” when a girl is born, and vice versa. Midwife spotted a penis on your newborn? Exclaim “it’s a girl! We’ll name her Elizabeth!”
Much simpler, saves money and operating room time too.