I’m studying the IPSO ruling, and one item jumps out at me.

4. The complainant said the article breached Clause 12 as she considered the claim that she was “a man who claim[ed] to be a woman” to be discriminatory as she legally changed her gender in 2018. The complainant considered she was deliberately misgendered with the intention being to offend her.

No no no no no. That’s what they refuse to get – or what they pretend not to get. The intent is not to “offend” him. It’s not about him. The intent is to say what’s true. The intent is to reject a major societal lie. The intent is to refuse all these orders to pretend a lie is true. The intent is to go on being able to talk about women without being constantly interrupted by men pretending to be women.

The vanity and narcissism and self-obsession keep announcing themselves. You’d think the “activists” would want to hide all that, wouldn’t you, but no, it’s their party piece.