Horrible man
No no no no we can’t have women saying it, we can’t have Rosie Duffield saying it, we can only have it when men say it, especially important men like Tony Blair.
Tip Jar
No no no no we can’t have women saying it, we can’t have Rosie Duffield saying it, we can only have it when men say it, especially important men like Tony Blair.
Quite apart from the blatant misogyny, Starmer’s ego is preventing him from admitting that he made a mistake and that Duffield was correct, and that he was wrong. Doubling down is the result. Starmer is really, really scared of pissing off trans activists and their flying monkeys. Not a good look in a leader. I’d really like to ask him what exactly the link is between Duffield and the murder for which she’s supposedly responsible. By bringing it up again, Starmer strengthens the idea that there is a link between the two, even though it’s only in his head. Some will believe that his insitence on connecting her must be based on something. But in this case, where there’s smoke, there’s…a trans activist’s smoke bomb.
By repeating the trans version of the Blood Libel, Starmer is doing the genderists’ dirty work for them. He’s spreading and reinforcing their lies. Women defending their rights kills trans people. Women saying that men aren’t, and can’t become women, kills trans people. Defending women’s single sex spaces kills trans people. Any questioning, doubt, or resistance from women is tantamount to murder or worse. How this plays out causally is never made clear. There are a lot of extra steps involved that are never specified. Thoughts and words, on their own, don’t do anything. They can’t “harm” in the way that trans activists would have us all believe. The mere presence of a feminist in a crowd of trans activists isn’t going to hurt anyone, however perfomratively “unsafe” they may claim to feel. Thoughts, speech, and writing do not work in that direct way*. If they did, then trans activists wouldn’t have to resort to bullying, assault, and mob intimidation to achieve their goals. Their own tactics belie their stated belief in the power of thought alone to harm one’s opponents.
Women are supposed to shut up, obey, and everything they have to TiMs. Their ultimate crime is saying “No” to the demands of men, Starmer included.
*I am open to persuasion. If Keir Starmer happens to burst into flame by the time I finish writing this post, I might have to reconsider my position, though I will take any failure to ignite as positive proof that thoughts and words just aren’t up to the task.
Women are supposed to shut up, obey, and hand over everything they have to TiMs.