Hang on, change of plans
Jonathan Chait is not amused at Biden’s outrageous abuse of power.
When President Joe Biden was running for a second term as president, he repeatedly ruled out granting a pardon to his son Hunter, who has pleaded guilty to tax fraud and lying on a form to purchase a gun.
But now he’s not running for anything so what the hell, might as well abuse the office.
Biden professed a willingness to abide by the results of the justice system as a matter of principle. But in breaking his promise, and issuing a sweeping pardon of his son for any crimes he may have committed over an 11-year period, Biden has revealed his pledge to have been merely instrumental.
…
President Biden’s complaint about the higher standard applied to his son reflects the perspective of myopic privilege. Crimes by family members of powerful public officials are far more damaging to public confidence than similar crimes by anonymous people. Holding them to account through strict enforcement of the law is good and correct.
What the president fails to note in his self-pitying statement is that Hunter Biden for years engaged in legal but wildly inappropriate behavior by running a business based on selling the perception of access to his father. The only commodity Hunter had to offer oligarchs in Ukraine, China, and elsewhere was the belief, or hope, that he could put in a good word for them with his dad.
And that’s the only reason those oligarchs paid any attention to him. As himself he had and has nothing to offer. It was always corrupt.
Joe Biden’s defense of Hunter’s influence peddling by stressing its narrow legality merely serves to highlight the hypocrisy of his fatherly indulgence. The black letter of the law was a fence to protect Hunter from the consequences of his sleazy behavior. And when the law itself trapped him, he simply opened a door and walked through it—a door no average American could access.
Which is about as privileged as it’s possible to be, which is why Biden should have kept that door firmly closed.
With the pardon decision, like his stubborn insistence on running for a second term he couldn’t win, Biden chose to prioritize his own feelings over the defense of his country.
Kind of trumpish of him.
At what point does engaging in “legal but wildly inappropriate behavior” become a crime?
I have no dog in this fight, but Old Joe pardoning Hunter for “legal but wildly inappropriate behavior” is a far cry from Trump’s plan to pardon the violent, shit smearing, rampaging thugs of Trump’s inauguration day.
One of my circle, only semi joking, says that Biden should pardon all the Jan 6 rioters to take the wind out of Trump’s sails on day 1. Maybe do it Jan 5 as his final middle finger to Trump.
Agreed.
Very trumpish indeed.
I’m extremely disappointed by President Biden’s decision to pardon Hunter.
Rev David B – well sure, Trump and his thugs are worse, but that’s a low low bar. It’s Biden who’s doing it right now and I’m disgusted by it.
It doesn’t protect him from Congressional inquiries, though, and now he can’t plead the fifth. Might be something of a Pyrrhic victory.