Where have we heard this before? US follows UK. Findings of a study begun in 2015 show no improvement to wellbeing of children given puberty blockers. Doctors say they haven’t published because they don’t want findings weaponised. 9 years they’ve known.https://t.co/uZegd2Abmwpic.twitter.com/nspswX4riB
The children had good mental health, and puberty blockers didn’t make their good mental health even better. Bury that finding in the cabinet under a stack of refrigerators in the basement.
This whole article is astonishing & bizarre.
This gender doctor hasn’t published the results of her study on puberty blockers because the results — which show no improvement in mental health for subjects — might be used to say, “let’s not use these drugs that don’t work.”… pic.twitter.com/0ErMkby1w8
It’s the “two kinds of experts” problem: science-minded people, polite and overcautious to a fault with their criticism, try to rationalize puberty blockers like they’re antidepressants — they only discuss them in terms of potential mood improvement.
That’s because it’s not scientifically possible to evaluate the religious belief that our sexed bodies are profane while our “gender identities” are sacred.
The cultists who’ve taken over the gender clinics don’t even care if puberty blockers have a negative impact on the children’s mood. They don’t see puberty blockers as antidepressants, they see them the way they see all “gender medicine”: as a mandatory rite of passage to bond new recruits into the group.
The media has to stop playing games and being coy about the facts: they need to report that sex is real and binary and that “transgender identity” is a non-natural kind — a social construct that emerged from within a religious subcultural group. Journalists need to ask every single “expert” they consult about “gender” whether they believe in the facts of biology or not, in order to separate out the gender cultists from the fact-based experts in this field, who have so far been far too reticent to call out the pseudoscientific metaphysical beliefs that plague the trans movement.
It’s the “two kinds of experts” problem: science-minded people, polite and overcautious to a fault with their criticism, try to rationalize puberty blockers like they’re antidepressants — they only discuss them in terms of potential mood improvement.
That’s because it’s not scientifically possible to evaluate the religious belief that our sexed bodies are profane while our “gender identities” are sacred.
The cultists who’ve taken over the gender clinics don’t even care if puberty blockers have a negative impact on the children’s mood. They don’t see puberty blockers as antidepressants, they see them the way they see all “gender medicine”: as a mandatory rite of passage to bond new recruits into the group.
The media has to stop playing games and being coy about the facts: they need to report that sex is real and binary and that “transgender identity” is a non-natural kind — a social construct that emerged from within a religious subcultural group. Journalists need to ask every single “expert” they consult about “gender” whether they believe in the facts of biology or not, in order to separate out the gender cultists from the fact-based experts in this field, who have so far been far too reticent to call out the pseudoscientific metaphysical beliefs that plague the trans movement.
“Bury that finding in the cabinet under a stack of refrigerators in the basement.”
Shouldn’t that be after the sign saying “Beware of Leopard”?
Zing.
[…] a comment by Artymorty on Draw your […]