A confusion of theys

Oh go to hell all of you – the police the BBC all of you.

Transgender woman guilty of rape after night out

Man. Man man man man man. Women don’t rape; women can’t rape. Women are the targets of rape, not the perps.

A transgender woman has been found guilty of rape following a night out. Lexi Secker, 35, of Lowbourne, near Melksham, was living as a man when she attacked a woman in Blunsdon, Wiltshire, on 23 April 2023.

Don’t be so ridiculous. The man wasn’t “living as a man”; the man was a man.

Swindon Crown Court was told Secker would be tried as a woman and she was found guilty of one count of rape on Friday, following a four day trial.

What does that mean? Who told Swindon Crown Court that?

And why? Why was a rapist “tried as a woman”? Women can’t rape. Only men can rape.

Det Con Corrina Wiltshire, from Wiltshire Police, said: “I would firstly like to thank our victim in this case who has been inspirational in the way they have handled things.”

They? They?? Why they? She’s a woman; even the Beeb said she’s a woman. Why “they”?

Why does the man get “she” while the woman he raped gets “they”? Why the determination to insult and erase and taunt women in every way possible?

She said the case had taken a long time to come before a judge and commended the victim for their commitment to getting justice, “despite the hurdles”.

“They have such incredible strength and I hope it shows others that they can do this too,” she added.

Which? Which they? Hope it shows others who can do this too? And why does Det Con Corrina Wiltshire, from Wiltshire Police, get to be a she when the victim doesn’t?

3 Responses to “A confusion of theys”

Leave a Comment

Subscribe without commenting