A committed activist
The father of a transgender athlete has been sentenced to 60 months in federal prison for distributing child pornography. Marc Jacques, the father of Maelle Jacques, cited his son’s transgender identity and his own advocacy for transgender rights in his letter to the court requesting a non-custodial sentence.
Why, on earth, would either of those (let alone both) be reasons not to lock him up? There are reasons to question the usefulness of custodial sentences in general, but how in hell does his son’s trans idenniny equal a reason to be lenient to him in particular?
More the other way around, I would think.
Maelle Jacques, 16, is a trans-identified boy who has become a controversial athlete at Kearsarge Regional High School for advocating for the elimination of female-only sports. In April, Maelle testified at the New Hampshire state legislature in opposition to a bill seeking to prohibit males from self-identifying into women’s sports.
In short he’s a determined enemy of female people. I’m not seeing how that’s a reason not to put Daddy in a cell.
Another character reference was provided by Dr. Elizabeth Counselman-Carpenter, a professor of social work at Adelphi University, who, like Maelle and Remi, pointed out that Jacques was a “committed member of his community and LGBTQIA+ activist” in her argument against a custodial sentence.
Which communinny? The child pornography one?
The trans-identified cheating boy is calling himself Male. We need a better writing team, this lazy lot are phoning it in.
Dad wants brownie points for having raised a Brave and Stunning Trans Child. He believes that he should bask in the reflected Glory and Holiness of his Sacred Offspring.
Well yes, he should be committed; that’s the point.