What the Guardian is covering up
Simon Edge on the Guardian’s dereliction of duty:
If you fail to report on the biggest medical scandal of the century, even though the story is everywhere else, you are part of the cover-up. You are deliberately hiding the story from your readers, who may well treat you as their primary if not only news source.
This is inexcusable at the best of times, but all the more so when those most at risk in this scandal are more likely to read the Guardian than other newspapers. By your silence, you’re telling those vulnerable people there is no scandal.
You’re also effectively telling them that any stories they may hear elsewhere about a supposed scandal aren’t valid – because if they were valid, you’d have reported it, right? In other words, you’re reinforcing the narrative that this is all a culture war motivated by hatred.
This is dereliction of journalistic duty on a gargantuan scale. I can’t think of any parallel that comes close to it. And I can’t think of a greater gap between a newspaper’s self-righteous image of itself and the nasty, shabby reality.
Even the Financial Times reviewed “Time To Think”.
https://www.ft.com/content/a45a9a0b-5d2f-4c4a-b2ef-6a8796ea5d10
Maybe the Guardian is trying to excuse itself with “Well, The Observer already covered that book”.
Maybe the Guardian should finally remove its “What Would Own Jones Do?” wristband.
“Maybe the Guardian should finally remove its “What Would Own Jones Do?” wristband.”
More like *Self-Own * Jones, if you ask me.
What happened to that self-own of a twitter thread where they asked for examples of misogyny? I assume that instead of writing a mea culpa, they’re still sitting there stewing about those nasty bitches.