Trump not refraining
Trump thinks he can do whatever he wants no matter what. He may turn out to be right.
Donald Trump slammed the judge presiding over his newest criminal case early Monday, testing her three-day-old warning that he refrain from “inflammatory” attacks against those involved in his case.
In a Truth Social post just before 1 a.m., Trump assailed U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan as “highly partisan” and “very biased and unfair,” citing as evidence a statement she made during the sentencing of a woman who participated in the mob that breached the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
“She obviously wants me behind bars,” Trump wrote.
He’s jumping up and down in front of the judge saying “Nyah nyah you can’t stop me.” I worry that he’s right, that no one will be able to stop him.
Trump was alluding to Chutkan’s remark during the October 2022 sentencing of Christine Priola of Ohio. Chutkan admonished Priola, before sentencing her to 15 months in jail, about the Jan. 6 mob’s threat to the peaceful transfer of power.
“I see the videotapes. I see the footage of the flags and the signs that people were carrying and the hats that they were wearing, and the garb,” Chutkan said. “And the people who mobbed that Capitol were there in fealty, in loyalty to one man, not to the Constitution, of which most of the people who come before me seem woefully ignorant; not to the ideals of this county and not to the principles of democracy. It’s blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.”
It’s an interesting ploy. He’s openly criminal and treasonous, so people say that’s what he is, so he uses their saying so as a reason to ignore them, including (and especially) law enforcement and prosecutors and judges. Terrifyingly, he may get away with it.
Chutkan’s sentiments have been common among judges who have sentenced Jan. 6 rioters. Several have expressed discomfort over punishing rioters — who had been deluged with lies about the election by Trump and steered to the Capitol with a warning that their country was being stolen and their livelihoods were in danger — while those who misled them have faced no consequences. But Chutkan is the first of those judges to end up with Trump as a defendant in her court, charged by special counsel Jack Smith with seeking to subvert the 2020 election with lies and a plan to violate the constitution.
Trump is so open and brazen with his crimes that he makes it impossible to find any judges who aren’t aware of them…thus they all have a “bias” against him. Case dismissed!
Trump’s conditions of release at his arraignment earlier this month included a vow — which Trump swore to uphold in court — that he would not intimidate or harass witnesses and officers of the court or threaten the administration of justice. It’s unclear what Chutkan will do if she determines Trump has violated those conditions.
Of course he’s violated them. He’ll continue to violate them.
Do these judges ever have dragged before them some idiot who has yelled ‘Fire!’ in a crwded theatre? It seems to me that Trump is guilty of something along those lines; particularly in view of the casualty count arising out of the Capitol Riot.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack#:~:text=Five%20people%20died%20either%20shortly,by%20suicide%20within%20seven%20months.
I don’t know law, but if being found in violation of a court order can in any way be used to delay a trial, I think he would use it. Get everyone bickering about this charge, while the more significant one is knocked down the road.
I’d think a more difficult problem is finding 12 impartial jurors.
Sastra, I think he would use it, too, but I think this is along the lines of the 3D chess – assuming Trump is making brilliant maneuvers to protect himself. I think he’s just being Trump.
The fact that Trump, even if convicted and imprisoned, could still run for President and win the election. There’s no Constitutional restriction that states he can’t. Eugene V. Debs ran for President while in prison in 1920. Trump’s legal strategy is identical to his election strategy, namely say he’s being unjustly persecuted and appeal to voters to vote for him and they well might do so even knowing he’s guilty because they’ve never cared before even when it’s obvious that Trump is a rapist. The way forward legally is to simply present the case(s) against Trump and let the truth be made public. Trump lost in 2020 and he won’t win with just his GOP base in the general election.