These are the questions of a cult
Eva Kurilova reports that Canadian schools are asking students impertinent questions about personal matters.
It was recently brought to my attention that a school district in Ontario was asking students to fill out a survey that asked them to indicate what their “gender” is. The options included male and female but did not end there. This was followed by “transgender,” “non-binary,” “questioning,” and “two-spirit,” among other ridiculous prompts. If your “gender” was not listed, you could specify further.
Are school districts 14 years old all of a sudden? Are they sharing selfies on Twitter? Have they lost their minds?
These are the questions of a cult, and schools are just taking them for granted. The idea that it’s possible to be something other than male or female or that “gender” takes precedence over “sex” (they never specify which view they are taking, because confusion is the whole point) is a cult idea. It is more than just a metaphysical belief—it is a marker of complete and total indoctrination, and activist educators have the country’s children believing it.
It’s as if school districts have been taken over by Moonies or UFO finders or Freudians. Schools are supposed to educate, not induct into lunacy.
It’s been going on for some time, Eva says.
A great example is the 2021-22 York Region District School Board Student Survey. This survey asked a similar set of questions, prompting students to accept the idea that they must have a “deeply felt” sense of their “identity” on the “gender spectrum” and then asking them what it was.
What people have is the experience of being told they are girls or boys from long before their brains could form memories. That’s what these fools claim is a “deeply felt sense.” The only reason the felt sense seems “deeply felt” is because they don’t remember the beginning because they were too young to remember anything. Confusing the forgotten with the deep is a rooky error.
Why not just start asking kids if they’re elves, refugees from Remulac, giant tortoises, sharks in people suits?
I absolutely love this statement and will commit it to memory (with slight omission):
The idea that it’s possible to be something other than male or female or that “gender” takes precedence over “sex” is a cult idea.
I find it endlessly irritating and infuriating that sex and gender are so conflated. Ask for “gender”, allow both sexes as answers, as well as gender concepts (transgender actually isn’t a gender, “trans girl” would be clearer, or “feminine” which actually IS a gender). “Questioning” is clearly NOT a gender, but rather a confession of confusion.
And taking all that fury and laying it aside for a moment, what’s worse is that we can reasonably guess that the survey’s point is to take all this data and conflate every reason for answering anything at all into solid beliefs of identity in the survey respondents. For someone like me, who is female and has no gender identity, and has been stuck answering nearly identical survey questions (but for adults, not school children), the end result is that they’re sneakily disguising a question that most ordinary people will interpret as a question of sex, and interpreting it as an answer of gender. To me, this is like being asked “what is your sex”, with the only answers being “my favourite colour is pink”, “my favourite colour is blue”, “my tastes in colour are too exotic to explain with words”.
The result is multiple confused data that all contain males, and that’s of limited usefulness, especially where the needs of the female population are concerned.