There it is, there’s the saying it out loud. He’s a better woman than women are because he had to fight for it. Women are like the children of millionaires while he is like the children of the scullery maid at Chatsworth.
Sorry Mr. Willoughby. Whether or not you fought to get where you are, you failed to achieve becoming a woman. You were doomed to failure from the start. All you have managed to do is turn yourself into a man who has damaged himself.
TIMs just can’t shake that male socialization, can they? He comes out flinging insults, fighting words, and then demands that women fight him. Sorry, Mister W, I saw enough of that silliness from males in my grade school so I won’t be meeting you on the playground after classes to have a scrap.
Willoughby claims to be a feminist (and surely not the only non-feminist to claim this), but here’s how this is damaging feminism: I just watched a video of Riley Gaines where she says feminism includes trans “women”… Riley claims she is not a feminist, and I’m sure she would never want to be if it included men, yet the prevailing attitude of right wingers seems to be that trans activism is affiliated somehow with feminism. Any feminism that includes men is not feminism. Trans activism is a Trojan horse filled with misogynists and it’s not only damaging feminism, but I think it’s damaging to the left in general.
(The video was on Crain & Company a month ago (I know, yuck, sports doofs) where she discussed Willy Thomas. Her comments about feminism were erroneous, but her estimation of Willy in her recounting of that situation was spot on.)
Something tells me the work he put in to “become a woman” is nowhere near the work we have to put in to live as a woman. It is damn hard, in spite of being a lot easier than it was for my mother, or my grandmother, or my great-grandmother…okay, I’ll stop there. My grandmother fought for suffrage. She deserves better than hearing this delusional male assume he has fought more than she has, just because she was born a woman. I will not allow her memory to be soiled by the likes of him. (And yes, she would be a TERF, at least the TE part. She wasn’t a rad fem; that didn’t exist when she was doing her fighting.)
Oh I think he’s proud as fuck. He’s proud of his taunting and bullying of women, he’s proud of his notoriety, he’s proud of all the attention he gets by taunting and bullying women. It’s way too easy to say all conceited boastful aggressive people are actually insecure rather than conceited.
You misunderstand me. I’m not claiming the poor dear is insecure in general, and I’m certainly not trying to deny his arrogance. I’m addressing this:
I’m so proud to be a woman
No. He’s not.
Ray Blanchard on Twitter, back in May, 2018–
Autogynephiles’ anger toward women results from envy of women and resentment at not being accepted by women as one of them. It is not misogyny in the normal sense. Furthermore, their sense of entitlement comes from narcissism, not systemic patriarchy.
(I disagree that it’s not misogyny. I suppose it can be distinguished from the “normal” kind, but it doesn’t need a new word.)
There’s been quite a bit written about this, much of it by Blanchard, Michael Bailey, and Anne Lawrence.
I too disagree with what Blanchard said there. How does one even tease apart entitlement and narcissism and systemic patriarchy as components of misogyny?! They feed and nourish each other.
Sorry Mr. Willoughby. Whether or not you fought to get where you are, you failed to achieve becoming a woman. You were doomed to failure from the start. All you have managed to do is turn yourself into a man who has damaged himself.
TIMs just can’t shake that male socialization, can they? He comes out flinging insults, fighting words, and then demands that women fight him. Sorry, Mister W, I saw enough of that silliness from males in my grade school so I won’t be meeting you on the playground after classes to have a scrap.
Willoughby claims to be a feminist (and surely not the only non-feminist to claim this), but here’s how this is damaging feminism: I just watched a video of Riley Gaines where she says feminism includes trans “women”… Riley claims she is not a feminist, and I’m sure she would never want to be if it included men, yet the prevailing attitude of right wingers seems to be that trans activism is affiliated somehow with feminism. Any feminism that includes men is not feminism. Trans activism is a Trojan horse filled with misogynists and it’s not only damaging feminism, but I think it’s damaging to the left in general.
(The video was on Crain & Company a month ago (I know, yuck, sports doofs) where she discussed Willy Thomas. Her comments about feminism were erroneous, but her estimation of Willy in her recounting of that situation was spot on.)
Something tells me the work he put in to “become a woman” is nowhere near the work we have to put in to live as a woman. It is damn hard, in spite of being a lot easier than it was for my mother, or my grandmother, or my great-grandmother…okay, I’ll stop there. My grandmother fought for suffrage. She deserves better than hearing this delusional male assume he has fought more than she has, just because she was born a woman. I will not allow her memory to be soiled by the likes of him. (And yes, she would be a TERF, at least the TE part. She wasn’t a rad fem; that didn’t exist when she was doing her fighting.)
A “21st century suffragette” is what he styles himself. So, fighting for the right for trans people to vote? Idiotic.
This is the (very) quiet part, said VERY loudly.
What’s that saying about wrestling with a pig again?
He’s not proud. He’s envious. And he wants attention, because without it, he’s a nobody.
So he not only claims to be a woman and a feminist, he’s also identifies as a Jew being pursued by Nazis >> https://twitter.com/IndiaWilloughby/status/1645844272501932058?cxt=HHwWtIC2oaqpm9ctAAAA
This is not a mentally healthy person.
Oh I think he’s proud as fuck. He’s proud of his taunting and bullying of women, he’s proud of his notoriety, he’s proud of all the attention he gets by taunting and bullying women. It’s way too easy to say all conceited boastful aggressive people are actually insecure rather than conceited.
Here’s the twitter filter that’s applied to the tweet >>
[Who can reply?
People @IndiaWilloughby follows or mentioned can reply]
That means replies are not open, stupid.
“validate my narcissism” Pfft.
You misunderstand me. I’m not claiming the poor dear is insecure in general, and I’m certainly not trying to deny his arrogance. I’m addressing this:
No. He’s not.
Ray Blanchard on Twitter, back in May, 2018–
(I disagree that it’s not misogyny. I suppose it can be distinguished from the “normal” kind, but it doesn’t need a new word.)
There’s been quite a bit written about this, much of it by Blanchard, Michael Bailey, and Anne Lawrence.
Willoughby:
Also Willoughby:
Blowhard.
Lady M – oh I see! I missed the replying to him part; my bad.
I too disagree with what Blanchard said there. How does one even tease apart entitlement and narcissism and systemic patriarchy as components of misogyny?! They feed and nourish each other.