Scrambling to add capacity
And the cruise ships still ply to and fro.
Travelers are drawn to Antarctica for what they can find there—the wildlife, the scenery, the sense of adventure—and for what they can’t: cars, buildings, cell towers. They talk about the overwhelming silence. The Norwegian explorer Erling Kagge called it “the quietest place I have ever been.”
All of these attractions are getting harder to find in the rest of the world. They’re disappearing in Antarctica too. The continent is melting; whole chunks are prematurely tumbling into the ocean. And more people than ever are in Antarctica because tourism is on a tear.
“Antarctica is so brilliant because it’s quiet and empty of people, so I’m going to go there!” The human story in a nutshell.
Four decades ago, the continent saw only a few hundred visitors each summer. More than 100,000 people traveled there this past season, the majority arriving on cruises.
That is, on cruise ships, the ones that burn 85 thousand gallons of fuel a day when in motion.
Perversely, the climate change that imperils Antarctica is making the continent easier to visit; melting sea ice has extended the cruising season. Travel companies are scrambling to add capacity. Cruise lines have launched several new ships over the past couple of years. Silversea’s ultra-luxurious Silver Endeavour is being used for “fast-track” trips—time-crunched travelers can save a few days by flying directly to Antarctica in business class.
Well if there’s anything you want when visiting Antarctica it’s ultra-luxury.
Traveling to Antarctica is a carbon-intensive activity. Flights and cruises must cross thousands of miles in extreme conditions, contributing to the climate change that is causing ice loss and threatening whales, seals, and penguins. By one estimate, the carbon footprint for a person’s Antarctic cruise can be roughly equivalent to the average European’s output for a year, because cruise ships are heavy polluters and tourists have to fly so far.
To repeat: cruise ships burn 85 thousand gallons of fuel a day. And this is purely recreational aka luxury travel – it serves no purpose other than the enjoyment of the people on the cruise ships and planes. Enjoyment is a good thing, but slowing the destruction of the Antarctic is a better thing.
Antarctic tourism also directly imperils an already fragile ecosystem. Soot deposits from ship engines accelerate snow melting. Hikes can damage flora that take well over a decade to regrow in the harsh environment. Humans risk introducing disease and invasive species. Their very presence, North Carolina State scientists have shown, stresses out penguins, and could affect the animals’ breeding.
Yet as tourism gets more popular, companies are competing to offer high-contact experiences that are more exciting than gazing at glaciers from the deck of a ship. Last year, for instance, a company named White Desert opened its latest luxury camp in Antarctica. Its sleeping domes, roughly 60 miles from the coast, are perched near an emperor-penguin colony and can be reached only by private jet. Guests, who pay at least $65,000 a stay, are encouraged to explore the continent by plane, Ski-Doos, and Arctic truck before enjoying a gourmet meal whose ingredients are flown in from South Africa.
Yeah that’s great, zip around on Ski-Doos and disrupt Emperor Penguins’ breeding. Whatever floats your jet ski.
In 2007, the MS Explorer, a 250-foot expedition cruise ship, sank near penguin breeding grounds on the South Shetland Islands, leaving behind a wreck and a mile-long oil slick. Most cruise ships are registered in what Stephens calls “flag-convenient countries” that are lax on oversight.
That’s nice. That’s an impressive touch.
It’s Wednesday. I think that’s the only day in the week there isn’t a cruise ship or two at the pier due west of where I’m sitting right now.
MS Explorer hurting penguins? Can we get Linus on this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tux_(mascot)
IMHO, therein lies the dilemma. It is either open for anyone and everyone with the desire and means to get there, OR it is closed to everyone: scientists, explorers, royalty; the entire human population of the Earth. Well, except maybe overflying planes, satellites, and robots and such.
It was my privilege a few years back now to visit Lord Howe Island. I am told that those who know the Pacific rate Lord Howe as the best of all Pacific islands; and it is only 2 hours flying time from Sydney. It is dominated by two massifs: Mounts Gower and Lidgbird, with officially guided tours to the summit of Mt Gower, while Mt Lidgbird is off-limits to all but officially approved people: scientists, officials, etc..
After a few hours’ climb, our party reached the summit of Mt Gower. The mutton birds nesting up there have no experience of predators, and consequently no fear. One can pick up a sitting mutton bird without resistance on its part, throw it up into the breeze and watch it glide down to the sea below within about 60 seconds. After maybe a spot of fishing on the hard coral reef, it will catch the prevailing updraft and effortlessly return through the height of the mountain (875 metres or 2,871 ft) soon enough. Though as their name suggests, they were once popular game for sailors, they are now fully protected.
https://lordhoweisland.info/
You know what the song says, “Call someplace Paradise, kiss it goodbye.”
The model for Antarctica was once that twelve nations agreed through the 1959 treaty that South of 60degrees lat. would be set aside for scientific exploration and no military bases or exercises would be carried out. They did not look ahead to the idea that they would need to include language about cruise ships. Can’t outlaw snowmobiles, though, as they are necessary for researchers to move around. Here’s the treaty:
https://www.antarcticreport.com/articles/the-antarctic-treaty
I’ve been saying for years that some places (Titanic!) just aren’t tourist destinations. Antarctic cruises are ruinous, not to mention selfish in the extreme.