Return of “Kayla”
It seems he’s back.
The principal highlighted to parents preparations for what he said may be an onslaught of media and potential controversary over trans teacher Kayla Lemieux’s return to the classroom, which included special entry and exit plans.
These will include “having students enter and exit the building using assigned doors at entry and dismissal” and “locking exterior doors during school hours, only using the front main doors during school hours” while “all students and visitors will be required to use an intercom system to enter and exit the building” and asking parents “to email or call before coming to the school if they wish to visit to speak to an employee.”
All for the sake of this insultingly ridiculous man who wears two basketballs shoved down his shirt.
While Lemieux has not responded to questions about the transfer to another school board, the Hamilton high school’s principal echoed the HWDSB’s message in his memo to parents.
“We are writing to you today because we anticipate the school your child is attending this year, Nora Frances Henderson, may receive some level of public attention, and we want to communicate what this means for you, your children and our school,” wrote Fisher.
While he didn’t name Lemieux specifically, he did tell parents the teacher is “an experienced educator” who was “recently the subject of public attention, pertaining to their gender expression, while teaching at a school in a different community.”
It’s not “gender expression,” it’s an insulting mocking sneering caricature of women. If this asshole showed up to teach school looking like Al Jolson would the administration be pampering him this way?
“Our foremost priority is the success of our students,” Fisher wrote. “We are committed to maintaining a professional environment that is safe, inclusive, and conducive to their learning.”
Clearly that’s not their foremost priority at all.
To ask the question is to answer it.
“We are committed to maintaining a professional environment that is safe-”
I wonder if the local fire department agrees with this, given all exterior doors are locked while in class.
From the video at the link:
I just want to wear giant fake tits and not have you notice.
Bwa-ha-ha-ha!
PS Use that chop saw with caution, Lady.
His “gender expression” is patently unsafe when working with power tools.
I don’t understand why this does not immediately disqualify him as a shop teacher.
The message is that we must accommodate and normalize all these side show freaks — this is what we do in the 21st century. Can’t these clowns do this shit on their own time? Why does it have to be in public? Aren’t there enough venues for them to display all their mockery and deviancies? Maybe the biggest failing of social media is that it’s not accommodating enough, the clowns need more. Dylan Mulvaney needs more. Rhys McKinnon needs more. Willy Thomas needs more. Jonathan Willoughby needs more. More fame, more attention, more validation. Force the general public to comply. Enlist allies in law enforcement and other administrative entities. Make it company policy. Make it law. Indoctrinate children. Eliminate women only spaces and endeavors. Mock the LGB movement and take it over. Mock feminism and take it over. Delegitimize it all. This is what it’s come to.
I may sound like a cranky old bastard, but these changes in society are not good. This is not progress or liberation. It’s decadence on steroids. You should have to seek these people out if that’s your thing, not force them and their “hobbies” or ideology on every unsuspecting and unwilling adult or child in the general public.
It’s literally a very small handful of people doing this, relatively speaking, but the amount of people who go along with it and demand that we all must comply is scary. The amount of stupid is also scary.
Well, my crankiness got the best of me this morning, rant over. :P
So he’s now become the equivalent of the paedophile priest shuffled around from parish to parish to parish instead of being removed. The union has much to answer for this situation; I can’t see how they square this with the dignity of its female membership.
Just wait until the furries on staff start demanding to be taken out for “walkies.”
What would happen if, say, half a dozen female teachers showed up wearing cartoon boob sets?
The inconsistency of this ideology is stark. On the one hand you have giant prosthetics and implants, or at minimum, nonfunctional, unnatural protrusions on bodies that don’t require them… and then on the other, “top surgery.” Sacrifices to the Gods of Superficiality.
This way madness lies.
This teacher is obviously a clown, but I find this part of the story to be odd:
Assuming the exterior doors are only locked from the outside, that is all pretty much standard in US schools today. I guess there’s not an explicit requirement to call or email before showing up, but you tend to do that naturally anyway, as you wouldn’t just march in and demand to speak to someone with no notice.
Maybe it’s different in Canada? Or maybe they were just reemphasizing existing policies?
Anyway, this teacher should be stopped or fired, but having multiple unlocked exterior doors so members of the public can randomly waltz in to confront him or other staff members isn’t part of the solution, as I’m sure everyone here agrees.
@Skeletor
I’m puzzled. Here in Germany, schools are usually open during school hours, anyone can “waltz in” without trouble.
Someone may (or may not) ask you what you are doing there, but that’s it.
Yes, it’s not that it’s different in Canada, it’s that it’s different in the US, because of our hideous gun culture and gun anarchism.
^ Likewise in Australia, all 6 of my schools had multiple buildings on grounds, and all of them save sheds and the like had open doors. Perhaps the mentality in USA is different due to its horrific gun problem, leading to schools becoming brutalist bunkers.
It hasn’t always been like that. Schools used to be open; that was just normal.
It’s certainly been decades since I was in a US school, but I remember as teenagers there wasn’t really anything stopping us from sneaking off, at lunch or for the day, and sneaking back in due course if we so chose. I guess that’s different now.
When I was in school in Toronto in the 1960s/70s, most of the doors were open during school hours (but if there was an event outside of normal hours, most of the doors would not be openable from the outside, though as noted by Skeletor, they would have “crashbars” that would allow exiting in case of fire etc). When my kids were at school in Ottawa during the 1990s, there was rather more security (in response to some unfortunate incidents) – most doors would be open only during arrival time, and for the rest of the day generally only the front door would be accessible from the outside. People who were not students or staff were expected to check in at the office and were issued an ID tag, and students were encouraged to report any adult who did not have ID.
As for this teacher, while I do think body positivity is an important goal, I honestly can’t see how this teacher is presenting anything but a taunting parody of femaleness. (As I think I said the last time this came up, it’s hard to imagine a better way to to discourage girls from taking shop, and encourage boys to think about girls as sex objects – but perhaps that is the desired outcome.)