Punchy McPuncherson
And speaking of hatred and incitement to violence – heavily filtered man in a dress brandishes his fists in our general direction.
Watcha gonna do, Indy, punch the nearest woman? What’s your point?
He takes us through his morning, which starts with checking Twitter for what people are saying about him.
I dry my hair, do my make-up. Head off to the cafe where I’m writing my book.
And, after ordering my usual pot of Darjeeling, sit down, and open my email.
“Congratulations on being nominated as a 2023 Woman of the Year”.
Congratulations on being even more of an insult to women.
Wow. Considering I live on what is now internationally known as Terf Island – where trans visibility and recognition is close to outlawed – I can’t believe it.
And I know it’s going to infuriate Tory deputy chairman Lee Anderson, GB News, and all the other forms of life that have grown like bacteria since 2018.
No mention of women though, the people he so insultingly tries to replace with his own glorious self.
I re-read the email. The nomination came from a panel of women. Interesting, considering I and the rest of the UK trans population are constantly told that the female population view woman like me as a threat and an offence to their dignity.
We also know perfectly well that there are many captured women.
Instead of moving forwards, Britain has hurtled backwards. It’s now normal to watch or listen to studio debates of non-trans people explaining what trans is, and how awful we are, with nobody trans there. Wouldn’t happen to any other minority.
You’re a white guy, Willz. You’re not an oppressed minority.
What rock has he been living under? And it doesn’t even have to be a minority.
Women’s health legislated and pontificated over by men.
Remember that Arab conference on women’s rights with zero women in attendance?
Black civil rights legislated by mostly older white people, who are also mostly men. Same for Hispanic people.
Labor laws written by the billionaire donor class.
LG rights determined by mostly heterosexual people, including a very insidious contingent of TiMs, who claim to speak on behalf of LG, while eradicating LG rights in plain sight.
He is lying again.
No, I think he has a point. There aren’t really studio debates about whether the other minorities might be mistaken about their nature as a minority — that black people are really white people who fell asleep in the sun last Tuesday or that women have been birthing babies out of their penis but somehow came up with the idea of the “uterus.” There are objective measures for all the other minorities, public methods of discernment. Homosexuals exhibit homosexual attraction. Even the mentally ill meet clinical criteria. But being trans is different: it’s a subjective experience knowable only to the individual and manifests itself however they want.
So of course that’s going to be up for debate by rational adults. And no, it’s not going to be settled by someone who identifies as transgender telling everyone that they really, really are transgender so hear me and believe and we’re done. This elaborate pantomime of absolute shock that there are experts on panels discussing the status of a culturally-influenced psychological state of distress involving rejecting one’s sex is tiresome.
Slogan of the day: ‘Iffa you gottat da donger, you don’ta belnga.”
Trouble is, for these transbuggers’ fantasies to work, they not only have to convince the world out there that they are the very opposite under their clothes to the sex they present as, they have to convince themselves as well. That would have to be one helluva lot harder.
So I take off my mitre to Pope Joan.
https://www.history.com/news/who-was-pope-joan
Evidence? Oh, wait, you don’t have to provide evidence. If a trans identified person says it, it’s true.
So what direction does the sun come up, Willoughby? I imagine it will bend itself to your will. (And yes, I realize the sun doesn’t ‘com up’ – that’s as much an illusion as transgender is delusion).
Well I clicked on the Herald link to read the “full story” but it wasn’t there, but the photo of Willoughby there is quite different than the Sugar Ray Leonard pose (with maximum photoshopping) above. Even in full makeup, Willoughby utterly fails to embody the ‘party girl’ stereotype he so desperately wants to project.
Sastra @ 2 – I in turn have a quibble.
Do they? Not really. Certainly not universally. It’s definitely not always self-evident who is homosexual and who isn’t. And surely sexual attraction, homo- or hetero-, is more subjective than objective? It’s not about bodies and external cues, it’s about feelings, which can be externalized but can also be concealed or just non-obvious.
I think that’s one reason the trans nonsense has been able to push so hard, now I think of it. It seems kind of similar, because it too can be entirely internal and secret.
Ophelia @6
It’s not always self-evident in everyday life, but theoretically it could be shown or disproven. You could observe someone in great detail over the course of their life. You could monitor their brain or genital responses to certain stimuli.
IOW it’s falsifiable, which “gender identity” is not.
Even the neuroimaging studies we have (and neuroimaging studies, I’ve gathered, should be assessed with caution) show that once you control for sexual orientation, transsexuals break down into very different groups, brain-map-wise.
Then consider that there are “trans” people without gender dysphoria, “non-binary” types like the one whose video Dr. Jebra shared, a handful of psychotics, and criminal types ranging from the Wi Spa exhibitionist to Isla Bryson and Barbie Kardashian.
I think someone should do a study where they use some gender dysphoric, gender non-conforming people who DON’T identify as trans as controls and compare them to trans-identifying people matched for sex, age, sexual orientation, and whatever else may be relevant. See if they can reliably tell the difference between the two groups. I doubt they could.
“Transgender” is an umbrella term for a disparate group of people with disparate reasons for transitioning. “Trans people” are people who’ve adopted the label “trans” for one reason or another, and we’re told to treat them as a monophyletic group each of whom is whichever “gender” he she or they claims to be, without question.
OB #6 It’s definitely not always self-evident who is homosexual and who isn’t.
If you’re sent up for a telephone number, your orientation may change or be changed for you.
“Heavily filtered” is a serious understatement. He looks nothing like that. It’s almost like they readjusted his head, too; there’s something off-kilter about it. (And I mean that in just a physical sense from this picture; we all know that psychologically he’s a lunatic.)