No YOU are
Endless spiral of opposites until we get lost in the not not not nots.
You can shout “AGAIN” all you want but it’s still the opposite of the reality. The women you’re calling “terfs” are not misogynists (nor are we misandrists, for that matter). We’re women who know that men are not women. That’s all it is. Hate is an emotion; facts are not emotions. It’s not hate to know a man when we see one.
It is true that we reject and dislike the ideology that tries to force us to agree that men are women if they say they are, but that’s in no way a hatred of women aka misogyny. It’s brazen theft to pretend it is.
There’s no such thing as a “transmisogynist.” That’s a meaningless label.
I do dislike some particular trans ideologues, but that’s not because of “misandry”; it’s because of what they are so determined to do to women, as in this very tweet. This shithead is deliberately working up hatred of women by accusing us of seeing trans women as inferiors to exploit. That’s a disgusting thing to say and ludicrously at odds with the reality. It’s the “Karen” ploy yet again – women who don’t submit to trans bullying are rich white bitches who exploit the working class.
Everything is the opposite of what it is. The world and everything in it is trans; resistance is futile.
It’s really hard to tell whether these people are very stupid, or extremely dedicated propagandists. I don’t know who this is, but at some point you have to wonder why they insist that green is red. Is it truly anomalous trichromacy, or is it intended to make us all believe that our own rods and cones are defective?
I can’t even keep track of the permutations of the argument anymore.
Actually, I can’t even.
How do TERFs “exploit” trans women anyway? Pay them less than “cis”women for the same job? Use them as prostitutes? Deny them service in public accommodations? Enslave them?
If you’re doing any of those things Ophelia, stop it. Now.
Atheists are only pretending not to believe in God as an excuse for a life of sin.
Yeah, validating their gender is high on gender critical feminists’ list of priorities…
Women (I refuse to say ciswomen) do not treat transwomen like men treat women. Transwomen treat women like men treat women.
The fact that transwomen do not have the slightest clue how men treat women (in spite of treating women that way) is yet more evidence that they are not women. They haven’t experienced what most women – perhaps all, but the data haven’t demonstrated that – experience. Not just what is mentioned by Bruce Coppola at 3. There is also domestic violence. Rape followed by murder (or sometimes the other order). Talking over them in meetings. Claiming their work.
And I’m pretty sure no GC feminist has told anyone who is trans (or an ‘ally’) to die in a grease fire. I am willing to be corrected on that if anyone has evidence otherwise.
If transactivists had evidence for any of the horrible things that feminists have been accused of doing, they’d be broadcasting it 24/7. They would only need one example, and they’d be repeating it over and over. Forever. But they don’t. They can’t even honestly report the actual words of JKR, because they’re completely innocuous. But because she says “No” she is bigoted, subhuman scum. If she was a tenth as evil as her reputation amongst trans activists (and the Three Ingrates she made rich and famous), she’d already be serving multiple life sentences for crimes against humanity.
Despite their desperate oppression envy, the threats, bullying, and violence are all in the other direction. Do women stalk and harass transactivists? No. Do they try to get trans meetings and events cancelled, or disrupt them when they can’t? No. Do women regularly assault transactivists, and openly call for their murder on their placards and online-purchased apparel? No. So transactivists have to resort to dogwhistles, innuendo, and subtext (in which “misgendering,” for example, can be indicative of anything and everything up to and including “trans genocide”). But trans activism’s awfulness to women is the gift that keeps on giving. They keep doing and saying horrible things, perpetually refreshing the ever-growing compendium of examples of terrible behaviour.
[…] a comment by Your Name’s not Bruce? on No YOU […]
That is quite a reach. Impressive, in its way.
I’m pretty sure some “GC” feminist had told someone to die in a grease fire or otherwise wished death upon someone, because that’s just the nature of Internet “discourse”. For years, I frequented a message board where the most common response to a claim to which one disagreed was an invitation to go choke on a barrel of engorged dicks. In fact, one didn’t really feel part of the community until such esophageal violence had been wished upon one. It was something of a rite of passage.
The point is that the Internet is not a polite, humane place. It’s full of rude people and people behaving rudely. That’s just the natural result of removing the immediate feedback mechanism of interacting with others in person.