Misogyny repackaged
The Times on Oxfam’s ostentatious hatred for women:
Oxfam has been branded “utterly shocking” for releasing an anti-trans cartoon character apparently based on JK Rowling.
The charity’s animated #ProtectThePride video was issued to mark Pride month. It said it could not “ignore the cruel backdrop” against which LGBT people marked the celebration.
And to illustrate the “cruel backdrop” it threw in a Cruella Rowling caricature.
The woman [in the caricature], with blood-red eyes and face contorted in hate, was wearing a green dress – similar to one worn by Rowling at a film premiere – and was looking at the Pride flag. As she appeared on screen, a caption said that LGBT people were “preyed on by hate groups online and offline”.
A green dress with a V-neckline and a colorful blob on the left, exactly like the one worn by Rowling.
Milli Hill, a feminist author, told The Times: “Oxfam’s caricature of an ‘ugly hag’ wearing a Terf badge is so typical of the attitudes displayed to feminists who stand up for women’s rights. We are evil old witches basically, and this is the same old misogyny we’ve been fighting for decades, repackaged as ‘progressive’ and ‘liberal’.
“It is utterly shocking that an established global charity like Oxfam would portray women in this way, it shows huge disrespect and discrimination – but it also shows their true colours.”
That applies to so many people. It’s been startling to learn how much loathing and contempt for women still bubbles away under the surface, ready to burst out whenever a woman says no.
The thing is that if they hadn’t given that hate figure JKR’s red hair, green V-neck dress and colourful blob on the left, I wouldn’t have thought the figure was a woman at all. It looks distinctly…TIMmy.
Piglet’s right. Another thing that has always been done with feminist women – cast them as ugly, unfeminine, sexless pseudo-women. Old, unattractive, manly – they only supported women’s rights because they couldn’t get a man. Now it comes back to fill in the same role, only this time it’s to demonstrate that we don’t “woman” as well as TiMs.
Same thing with the Jew caricatures – make sure they’re ugly.
The implication, that ugly people don’t have rights, is never mentioned.