List them
It’s not working any more. There are many replies and most of them ask the obvious and necessary question that has been neglected too long: what rights??? What rights exactly are you talking about? What rights don’t you have? What rights specific to trans people do you have in mind? Spell. them. out.
What rights? What rights is Helen trying to remove? What rights???
Of course there is a familiar motte and bailey that often comes up:
Something can be a “right” the same way that e.g. bodily autonomy is a right. I.e. the kind of right that no government can take away (violate yes, take away no). If the law says otherwise, the law is wrong.
On the other hand something can be a “right” in the same technical sense in which e.g. owning slaves was a right in the American South before the civil war, I.e. permitted by the laws of that particular state at that particular time. In this narrow sense the Abolitionist movement could legitimately be accused of trying to “take away the rights” of white people. Not a very compelling argument, is it…
The desired conclusion (the bailey) is that e.g. the “right” of biological males to invade female only spaces, is a right in the former sense. But if pressed for a clarification TRAs can always fall back on the latter technical sense (the motte): “Well the laws we have managed to smuggle in through the back door (on the back of more popular causes like gay marriage or bans of gay conversion therapy) with no meaningful debate do grant trans-identified males that right, and those evil TERFs are trying to take it away”. Still not compelling.
(The formulation “the rights trans people currently have” [my emphasis] kind of gives the game away)