Inclusion but not for thee
Jo Bartosch wonders “why the University of Leicester’s Research Centre for Museums and Galleries (RCMG) has developed guidance on ‘trans-inclusive practice’.”
It does sound odd, doesn’t it. What “practice”? In what way do museums and galleries have any “practice” with regard to “inclusion”? I don’t want museums exerting any “practice” on me, I just want to walk around them seeing what there is to see.
There is a need for inclusive practice when it comes to people with disabilities – they don’t want to put stairs in people’s way, for instance. But there’s nothing about being trans that would require special “inclusive” arrangements. Neutral toilets maybe? One sad little neutral toilet for the occasional gender-haver?
Last week, a ‘Trans-Inclusive Culture’ document was published by the RCMG, backed by high-profile organisations and heartily endorsed by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. The aim is apparently to enable cultural institutions to be ‘more ambitious and confident in advancing trans inclusion’. To do this, they should supposedly bring ‘clarity, common sense, pragmatism and ethics to a debate that is too often distorted by misinformed, highly charged and polarised viewpoints’.
In aid of what though? Are the curators going to stop curating and instead wander around the museums and galleries all day looking for trans people to include and patronize?
I’m afraid it looks terribly performative and not at all useful. It’s basically just an exercise in “We’re on the right side, don’t shout at us, shout at those evil feminist women instead of at us.”
Ironically, the document itself reads as highly charged and polarising. With the chilling fervour of obedient Soviet citizens, the authors argue that Britain’s cultural institutions are spaces where ‘we can manifest and model inclusion and equity’. It is clear that those who hold the keys to our collective heritage do not simply want to present visitors with engaging exhibits. They also want to tell them what to think.
How would one go about modeling inclusion and equity in a museum? Rush up to people who look trans and give them massive hugs?
The RCMG advises that museums and galleries ensure their ‘allyship and support for the trans community is permanently visible’. It goes further than promoting the use of ‘gender-inclusive language’ and tells cultural organisations that they should be ready to defend themselves against potential gender-critical protests by ‘preparing clear and unequivocal public statements of support for trans-inclusive programming’. Institutions should ‘nurture and value’ ‘partnerships with trans communities and staunchly defend them in the event of any negative public or media criticism’.
Ohhh, I see. That’s what they’re up to. It’s not about being inclooosive, it’s about joining the crowds monstering feminist women. How very enlightened.
No no no, not at all! ‘Highly charged’ and especially ‘polarising’ only apply to people that do not share the faith. What’s more polarising than disagreeing with the one true faith??
So, I strongly suspect that the museum officials responsible for this are not, in fact, meaning to target gendercrit feminists. Instead, they’re trying to encourage people to turn away from the actual transphobes of the GOP and their pundits.
Unfortunately, like so many groups, in their rush to oppose the genuinely diabolical influence of the rising fascists, they’ve opted (as so often happens) to toss women under the bus.
Freemage, what has a foreign political party got to do with it?
Perhaps it means that on the title cards for each piece of art there should be a statement on the ally/phobe stance of the artist. This way the transactivists will know which pieces to vandalize and which ones to guard.
If you enjoy art, what does it matter what sex you are or what gender you prefer to pass as? It’s nobody’s bloody business, and it is certainly no business of museums, art galleries, or Kew Gardens.
Whoops, sorry, off to Incloosion Re-education for you, where you will learn that it IS everyone’s bloody business and which opinions you are required to have. Pack wisely; you will be there for some weeks.
Three very large trans-policemen in Red-Guard make-up are at the door. I’m packing my bag (only one allowed), and will shortly be off to the re-education camp, where I am told I shall be transtructed in ‘correct-think’. I have also been told that it may not be a matter of a few weeks – ‘As long as it takes for you to get things right,’ one said, ‘and if you prove to be intransitive and there’s any back-sliding afterwards, you’ll be back in for good.’
“Intransitive” – very good.