Guys just wanna have fun
So Northumbria Police harassed a woman for saying men are not women, and because the police harassed her for stating an obvious banal truth, Newcastle United FC did its bit by punishing her further. Who else is going to step up? Will she be banned from the buses? Thrown out of Waitrose? Escorted out of the library?
A gender-critical Newcastle United fan says the club have suspended her membership because police investigated her for tweeting that “trans women are men”.
The cops investigate women for saying men are men, and then everyone else steps up to punish those wicked shameless whorey women who know that men are men. Welcome to the new Inquisition, so much more inclusive and diverse than the old one.
The 34-year-old, who asked not to be identified, was interviewed under caution by police after a complaint over tweets in which she also said that gender-affirming surgery was “mutilating children”. The investigation has now been dropped.
The woman was told by the club that her account had been “temporarily suspended” while Northumbria Police investigated her for online posts.
The lifelong Magpies supporter said the club had still not reinstated her membership. “I have been in shock about the whole thing,” she told the Telegraph. “I’ve missed some big games. It’s been a bit of a nightmare.”
Remember, kids – this is not because the cops suspected her of raping someone, or cutting someone’s throat, or torturing someone. This is because the cops suspected her of saying men are men.
The club said it was “standard practice” to suspend anyone under police investigation and that her alleged offence “contravenes our ground regulations”.
Their what? What can it possibly have to do with Newcastle United that a woman said a man is a man?
It came as a shock for the loyal supporter, who was unaware she was under police investigation at all. “I didn’t have a clue what I had been accused of,” she said.
On Friday, she was asked to attend a voluntary interview at Forth Banks Police Station in relation to “malicious communications” over several posts on X, formerly known as Twitter.
One tweet read: “Just your daily reminder that trans women are men.”
…
Harry Miller from WeAreFairCop, a gender-critical organisation which advised the woman, said: “There’s nothing that comes close to being criminal. The process is the punishment. They (police) do this to terrorise members of the public. They have put this woman through absolute hell.”
All because she says men are men. That’s where we are now.
How did NUFC even know the cops had dragged her into the station for some torture? That would appear to be the doing of this smug asshole:
I’m quite certain that “Why” from yesterday will not see this post, nor if in doing so will see what we point out.
Which–as I have said elsewhere is impossible.
Some level of intolerance–which is not entirely an objective concept–is inevitable.
Thankfully the smug git is being ratioed so hard we may need new mathematics to describe it.
But the process is indeed the punishment and until their are real costs to this sort of abuse of power it will remain an effective tactic. Too many women have too much to lose for it not to be.
‘Intolerant of intolerance’. It is to laugh. Newcastle United is owned by Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, a sovereign wealth vehicle of that paragon of tolerance, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Homosexuals and other ‘deviants’ such as transgender are criminals subject to sanction up to and including capital punishment.
But, you know, as long as they keep the millions flowing to buy players and let the locals persecute the TERFS, who cares?
But the club says it’s “inclusive.” Does that mean it will now ban its ownership?
BUT MISGENDERING IS WORSE!!!!
I did not know NUFC is Saudi-owned. That is PERFECT. Godalmighty these people.
Sports culture is plenty toxic, so it’s not surprising to see some “Team Trans vs. Team Terf” fatuity. Witness the mindset. I suppose calling the cops is similar to whining to the referees about some rule violation or other.
Except for the extreme disparity in consequences for the target.