Genetic advantages
A genius comments on Joan Smith’s The Brits go gender-neutral and women disappear:
This is the real paradox of late stage feminism, by insisting that women can be equal to men in everything and anything they have forced women to compete in spaces and venues where Nature has given men genetic advantages – hence women are pushed down the hierarchy.
Yes indeed, women are genetically inferior to men in the writing novels departments, which is why we’ve never heard of Jane Austen or Emily Bronte or George Eliot or Charlotte Bronte or Edith Wharton or Willa Cather or Mary McCarthy or Margaret Drabble or Margaret Atwood.
That Harry Syles could really make his mark by playing Juliet. Or maybe Lady MacBeth?
I keep encountering such comments by men; completely misrepresent the position of feminism, and then blame women for the behaviour of men based on the misrepresentation, thus confirming the misogyny of the commenter.
The belief in “late stage” anything is ridiculous… You don’t get to call anything “late stage” until it’s been dead and buried, only then can you demonstrate what the late stage is…