Due to safety concerns
Callow misogynist reporter Tom Harwood tells us Labour is afraid of Pride.
LGBT Labour is a highly visible and notable wing of the Labour Party, with dozens of official patrons in Parliament, and a string of campaigning successes under the last Labour government.
Yet today GB News can reveal that the official Labour group are considering withdrawing from marching from all LGBT pride events this year due to safety concerns for their members, fearing backlash from the community.
In other words Harwood is revealing that the official Labour group is afraid of people involved in LGBT pride events. Which ones? The L? Probably not. The G? The B? Come on. No, they’re afraid of the T, because the T and their “allies” get violent. Harwood is trying to tell us Labour is being mean to LGBT but in fact he’s telling us Labour is afraid of the T.
A senior source within the group told us that the Labour Party has become viewed with increasing hostility within parts of the LGBT community in recent months, following a series of U-turns from the leadership of the Party.
The hostility has grown to the point that many members now do not feel comfortable marching under the Labour Party banner.
Because T and their “allies” get violent. Physically violent, not just verbally.
The Labour Party leadership’s murky U-turns on transgender issues have led to what I am exclusively told are genuine safety concerns for members at pride events. In an extraordinary development, unthinkable just a few years ago, the Labour Party brand is becoming toxic within the LGBT community. So toxic that the official LGBT wing of the Labour Party is questioning the extent to which it can represent the party.
He’s exclusively told. Babes have I got the latest gossip for you.
Afraid but withdrawing, not afraid and meekly complying and begging for forgiveness. This is progress. I guess another step would be Starmer abandoning his belief that 0.1% of women have penises.
Since “Being mean to
LGBT” is anything other than grovelling submission, most of everyone is “mean” without ever knowing it. We’re all on probation and suspect until deemed sufficiently supine. But we’re starting to see cracks in the dam. Once enough people no longer fear the whip-hand of trans activism, it will lose even more power, particularly if it is dropped by government and media “allies.” The more we can do to hasten this process the better, though it’s unlikely to happen without scandal, lawsuits, electoral embarrassment, and a lot of testeria.It’s all very Biblical, if you think about it. In the Bible (especially the Old Testament), people were always falling on their faces in worship or shame or guilt. Falling on their face was a sign of submission, of course. TAs are telling us “Fall on your face, underling!” or maybe it’s more “I, Ming the Merciless, command you!”
I like this:
GB News tends to represent gender critical arguments fairly, and they have gender critics like Andrew Doyle on staff. So I’m not sure why Tom Harwood put scare quotes around “gender critical” in his article.
Yes I’m puzzled why Tom Harwood is at GB News at all. Maybe he’s their thought-diversity hire.
He’s really bending over backwards to avoid naming the elephant in the room. Does he think that makes him “objective” or something?