Change your definition, sluts

Trans “activism” can never get enough punishment of women; it always wants more more more.

Two University of Wyoming sorority alumni have been callously removed as members after more than 50 years by the national organization after supporting a lawsuit to oust the first transgender member.

Kappa Kappa Gamma sisters at University of Wyoming alleged earlier this year that the 6ft2, 260lb trans member would ‘peep at (the other girls) while visibly aroused’ 

Patsy Levang and Cheryl Tuck-Smith, who had been with Kappa Kappa Gamma for more than 50 years, were expelled after they allegedly fundraised for the lawsuit contesting the sorority’s admission of a transgender woman. 

That’ll show those evil bitches.

A district court judge found in favor of the sorority and Langford in Westenbroek v. Kappa Kappa Gamma, ruling that the sorority’s bylaws – as a private, voluntary organization – don’t define who’s a woman.

The six members had raised safety concerns and detailed allegations against Langford, but said they were told to ‘change our definition of woman’ in the September 2022 lawsuit

Women are told to change their definition of woman to mean the opposite of what it means.

That’s like being told to change your definition of “day” so that it includes “night” or your definition of “on” so that it includes “off.” You have to change your definition of this word so that it includes its own opposite. Let’s do that with all the words, and see how it goes.

At the heart of the lawsuit was the issue of defining a ‘woman’, with the sorority sisters arguing that because KKG’s governing documents define it as a space exclusively for females, the organization broke its own rules by admitting a biological male.

The sisters claimed that the sorority changed its criteria to allow Langford to apply, while KKGs lawyers said the definition of ‘woman’ has evolved since the sorority’s founding 150 years ago.

Yeah right it’s “evolved” to include men.

Ok so then can we have a word that means what “women” used to mean? “Wimen” maybe? “Wominn”? Something like that? Because we do still need a word that means “women” – not “women plus any men who feel like calling themselves women.”

‘The term (woman) is unquestionably open to many interpretations,’ the sorority’s filing claimed.

Yeah? Like what? Can it mean seal? Trumpet? Cheese sandwich? Moon? Luxury yacht?

Also that “unquestionably” is a bit of a laugh. Hello, I’m questioning your assertion.

Although the plaintiffs offered a definition in their lawsuit as an ‘adult human female’, KKG said this was restrictive, and were seeking to dismiss on the basis of changing views around what constitutes a ‘woman’.

No, let’s not do that. We all know perfectly well “what constitutes a ‘woman’.” We have not consented to changing the meaning of the word so that men can use it and then push us out of it.

6 Responses to “Change your definition, sluts”