Brink
World is on brink of catastrophic warming, U.N. climate change report says
Leading scientists warned that the world’s plans to combat these changes are inadequate and that more aggressive actions must be taken to avert catastrophic warming.
Must be but won’t be.
The report released Monday from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) found that the world is likely to miss its most ambitious climate target — limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial temperatures — within a decade. Beyond that threshold, scientists have found, climate disasters will become so extreme that people will not be able to adapt. Basic components of the Earth system will be fundamentally, irrevocably altered. Heat waves, famines and infectious diseases could claim millions of additional lives by century’s end.
That’s not quite the right way to put it. All lives are finite. Heat waves, famines and infectious diseases could end millions of additional lives early.
The IPCC report shows humanity has reached a “critical moment in history,” IPCC Chair Hoesung Lee said. The world has all the knowledge, tools and financial resources needed to achieve its climate goals, but after decades of disregarding scientific warnings and delaying climate efforts, the window for action is rapidly closing.
The knowledge, tools and financial resources but not the will or the ability.
Both the U.N. chief and the IPCC also called for the world to phase out coal, oil and gas, which are responsible for more than three-quarters of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Meanwhile people keep buying SUVs and going on cruises and taking planes.
Fish populations are dwindling, farms are less productive, infectious diseases have multiplied, and weather disasters are escalating to unheard-of extremes. The risks from this relatively low level of warming are turning out to be greater than scientists anticipated — not because of any flaw in their research, but because human-built infrastructure, social networks and economic systems have proved exceptionally vulnerable to even small amounts of climate change, the report said.
…
In 2018, the IPCC found that a 1.5C world is overwhelmingly safer than one that is 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) warmer than the preindustrial era. At the time, scientists said humanity would have to zero out carbon emissions by 2050 to meet the 1.5-degree target and by 2070 to avoid warming beyond 2 degrees.
Five years later, humanity isn’t anywhere close to reaching either goal. Unless nations adopt new environmental policies — and follow through on the ones already in place — global average temperatures could warm by 3.2 degrees Celsius (5.8 degrees Fahrenheit) by the end of the century, the synthesis report says. In that scenario, a child born today will live to see several feet of sea level rise, the extinction of hundreds of species and the migration of millions of people from places where they can no longer survive.
Or the child born today will be one of the millions wiped out by floods or droughts or crop failures or the perils of migration.
Rather than participating in the ridiculous, professional wrestling act of Democrats vs. Republicans, people should have started doing the hard thinking about coming up with solutions that disregard both those sets of psychopaths.
Biden opening up Alaska for more drilling? What’s the point of voting for such a party? More solar panels?
Who are the people/what are the forces standing in our way? How can we neutralize them? Can we neutralize them?
I suppose it’s too late. Some people find pessimism and fatalism to be tiresome character flaws. I feel the same way about baseless optimism and groundless hope.
Or the child born today will be one of the millions (Billions) killed in endless wars as the richest and most powerful nations seek water, clean air, and new land to exploit.
The next war won’t be over oil, but clean water.
I think it’s not “but” but “and” – oil and water and temperature and land and food…everything, basically.
One semi-positive thing to think on here: those powerful nations aren’t conducting those wars now even though they really ought to from a strategic perspective. We’re still insufficiently nasty to do the expedient thing to preserve our lifestyles. We’re also insufficiently nice to do the necessary things to preserve others.
“Meanwhile people keep buying SUVs and going on cruises and taking planes.”
and worst of all shutting down nuclear power plants.
When that is done the needed power is generated by burning natural gas or coal.