Because women won’t wheesht
Is that another crack in the foundation?
Police Scotland has withdrawn from a diversity scheme run by Stonewall, the controversial gay and transgender rights group.
The controversial group that used to campaign for gay rights but now campaigns for trans rights instead, often at the expense of gay rights.
The charity has been criticised for its stance on trans issues. Police Scotland is understood to be the first high-profile Scottish public body to have quit the scheme, which has attracted the support of the Scottish government — currently 89th on Stonewall’s top 100 employers index.
The fanatical, destroy everything else support of the Scottish government.
In 2021, the BBC announced its withdrawal from Stonewall’s diversity champions scheme after concerns about impartiality. The House of Commons, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission, the House of Lords and Ofcom have also left.
…
Critics claim the scheme wields undue influence over some public sector organisations. The workplace equality index rewards employers for promoting LGBTQ+ ideology both internally and outside the workplace, allowing them to climb the rankings.
But more T ideology than LGB ideology. LGB rights don’t rely on an ideology in the way claims about T rights do. LGB rights don’t require people to lie and ignore and pretend the way purported T rights do.
Stonewall said: “We’re proud of our diversity champions programme, which supports workplaces to create LGBTQ+ inclusive environments where all staff can thrive.”
No it doesn’t. It supports workplaces to create environments where staff are bullied and punished and fired if they don’t agree that men can be women.
H/t Holms
Your last line is exactly what I thought when I read that quoted part. All staff whose views we approve of can thrive. The rest are TERFS, and so not really human.
Tigger:
Once a label is stuck on, the politics of the rest is easy. Debate can then proceed, category by category.
“The controversial group that used to campaign for gay rights but now campaigns for trans rights instead, often at the expense of gay rights.”
Spot on.
And here we see the point of the forced teaming, as it hides the very damage that transactivism causes to the community it is parasitizing. It offers the T cover to remake and redefine the original mission statement of the movement it has co-opted, all the while accusing TERFs of attacking the LGBTQ “community.” Who would ever suspect (self-proclaimed) “allies” to attack the needs and rights of their “own” “community”? And insistence upon “No LGB without the T” * means that any criticism from lesbians, gays, or bisexuals defending their rights can be painted as “betrayal” of the “community,” even though transactivists shamelessly crossed that line first. DARVO’s a bitch, right? As far as harm to LGB people, the call is not so much coming from inside the house, as that they’ve suddenly discovered that they’ve been evicted from the very dwelling they built.
*(Gee, I wonder who came up with that one?)