Austin Killips cheats women
Oliver Brown at The Telegraph on the latest outrage:
In what has been described as a “Lia Thomas moment” for cycling, Austin Killips, a 27-year-old transgender rider, has won first prize for women at the Tour of the Gila, the premier road race in New Mexico.
It marked the most significant result yet for Killips, a trans-identifying biological male from Chicago, who also won a medal in women’s cyclo-cross at the US National Championships and who is now tipped to challenge for a place at the Tour de France Femmes and at next summer’s Paris Olympics.
Another man steals another prize from women, and hopes to steal more.
This year’s running of the Tour of the Gila marked the first time in the event’s 36-year history that equal prize money had been offered, with a total purse of $35,350 (£28,145) in both the men’s and women’s races. Killips, who only took up cycling in 2019 before starting on hormone replacement therapy, earned almost £8,000 for finishing top of the women’s general classification, plus an £800 bonus as “Queen of the Mountains”.
Equal prize money for men and women but hahahahaha we’re counting men as women if they tell us to so actually all the money goes to men hahahahaha sucks to be you, bitches.
Killips’ name first came to wider attention in March, after being cited by former cyclo-cross champion Hannah Arensman in a Supreme Court filing explaining why she was retiring from the sport at 24. Arensman had lost out on a podium place to Killips in the national finals in December, later accusing her transgender opponent of repeatedly shoving her during the race – a claim Killips denied.
He denied it despite the existence of video clips showing him doing it.
“I have decided to end my cycling career,” Arensman said. “My sister and family sobbed as they watched a man finish in front of me, having witnessed several physical interactions with him during the race. I feel for young girls learning to compete, who no longer have a fair chance at being the new record-holders and champions in cycling because men want to compete in our division.”
Amid the Killips controversy, Thompson, who came third at the women’s Tour de France in 1986 and 1989, argued that the pattern was becoming more common. “These women are young, and there’s a lot of bullying,” she said. “They get cancelled, they get silenced, their jobs are threatened. They get put on the TERF [trans-exclusionary radical feminist] list. If they say anything, they are eviscerated. And so, instead of fighting this, they just walk away.”
…
With results rapidly improving, Killips is allowed to compete as a consequence of the UCI’s
liberal[anti-woman] transgender policy, which stands starkly at odds with World Athletics’ approach of banning all post-puberty males from the female category.
Flagrant injustice.
And the more prizes that become equal with men’s divisions, the more men will complete. Why let some man take that top prize away from you, when you can take it away from a woman?
Of course, for some of these mediocre athletes, the former smaller top prize in women’s divisions would be way more than they could hope for in the men’s.
And it’s interesting how many of them are late comers to the sport; makes you wonder if he started cycling because he realized he could defeat a lot of young women who had been training all their lives? And if they show him any challenge, he’ll just shove them out of his way…literally. Sort of like Hannah Mouncey and the injuries he has inflicted.
Sort of like Callum Mouncey and the injuries he has inflicted.
I don’t care if it’s “deadnaming”, we should use their male name every time to point out the emptiness of their claims of being women.