An “unusual” decision
If you’re a man who claims to be trans you can do whatever you want.
A transwoman who admitted having dozens of indecent images of children has been spared jail after magistrates said they took an “unusual” decision.
Images of children being sexually abused, that is.
Tanya Howes, 66, was told by magistrates that the offences “would normally attract immediate custody”.
But they said they had decided to suspend a 12 month jail term, something they conceded was “unusual”.
But you see he’s a Member of the Trans Communniny so it wouldn’t do to punish him.
A ban on trans women with male genitalia who are violent or sexual offenders serving sentences in female prisons came into force earlier this year.
No trans women should be serving sentences in female prisons.
Howes, of Netherwood Green, Norwich, was sentenced to a total of 12 months imprisonment, suspended for two years.
Ian Taylor, chair of the bench of magistrates, said: “These offences would normally attract immediate custody.”
“But you’re trans so you can do whatever you want all the time.”
Damien Moore, mitigating, said: “This case has attracted publicity that has inevitably had consequences for her in her personal life. It’s very, very clear that she will forever more have to live with the shame and embarrassment that these offences bring upon someone”.
Or maybe he doesn’t feel any shame and embarrassment.
Yes but yousee in Opression Olympics Theory, men that call themselves women are, like, so vulnerable that they even beat exploited children.
My god, I missed this absolute gem on the first pass.
“This case has attracted publicity that has inevitably had consequences for her in her personal life. It’s very, very clear that she will forever more have to live with the shame and embarrassment that these offences bring upon someone.”
Oh you mean like with every crime? Let alone those against children ffs.
That same rationale applies equally to any other kiddie porn possessor. He’s not an iota different from them.
They didn’t possibly consider where to imprison him, did they? He’s male; he should go immediately to the men’s jail. If pervs have to have a separate unit to protect them from the general population, then put him in with them, where he belongs. By statute, they couldn’t consider putting him in the women’s prison, so they couldn’t possibly have thought that they should put him there. They don’t really think he’s an actual woman, do they? They don’t legitimately think, “that’s a woman whom we can’t put in women’s prison, so we have to let ‘her’ go,” do they? They have to know that he’s a man who can and should be put in the men’s prison where he belongs.
“He added that at the time of these offences Howes was “in a very dark place” but was now in a “stable, loving relationship” and has the “full support of her children”.”
Anybody else hoping those are adult children?