A theoretical bisexual
When museums and galleries tell us lies.
That’s so ridiculous. There were no “LGBTQIA+” groups in 1988. That wasn’t a thing.
Trans ideology along with all its other flaws is gruesomely imperialist. Get outta the way you boring lesbians and gays, trans people and “queer” people are way more interesting and exciting than you.
If you want to learn more from pink suit guy here he is:
I’m sorry, but you’re not even theoretically bisexual if the thought of physical intimacy with one of two human sexes is off-putting to you. Either that or every single one of us is bisexual. I know which definition I’m opting for.
It’s weird how they are allowed to have a sexual preference for women, but lesbians aren’t.
The assorted posts on here over the last couple of days would have convinced me, were I not already convinced, that far too many men see women as magically-animated commodities with no personhood at all. Like the brooms of the sorcerer’s apprentice; useful when controlled by men, but by no means allowed to make decisions or disaster will befall.
Ah, but you see, Tigger, our orientations refer to sex, while their preferences refer to gender. Or something similarly bootstrappy.