A person seemingly exposing
Oh yes about that guy with his dick out:
Victoria Centre statement over pictures of person exposing themselves in House of Fraser
Not themselves, just himself. He’s a guy.
A statement has been issued after photos of a person appearing to indecently expose themselves in a Nottingham designer shop caused rage on social media. The censored pictures have been widely shared on social media, depicting a person seemingly exposing their private parts in public.
What an abominable piece of writing. The photos were of a man apparently flashing in a Nottingham shop.
Users have identified the shop where the pictures were taken, which was in various locations across House of Fraser, in Nottingham’s Victoria Centre. The person seems to pull up their skirt slightly, revealing stockings, while posing at the camera smiling.
The man. His skirt. Also that was only one of the photos; the others were more…er…direct, although I’ve only seen them with an emoji over the actual naughty bits.
pause to rummage through Twitter
Ah yes, this is the one.
But no trans women are AGP or in anyway likely to behave inappropriately in public places. Nooooo…
Following the links where they take us, we learn:
From that I would hazard a guess that she is a female of the non-trans variety, and that her preferred pronouns are ‘she’ and ‘her,’ and not ‘they’ or ‘it.’
But then again, covering all possibilities, I could be wrong.
Crib sheet for journalists:
Third person plural pronouns are to be reserved for instances where the sentence refers to multiple people, or an unknown number of people, or one person whose sex is currently impossible to ascertain (as in the writer(s) of anonymous graffiti, for example).
They are not to be used where the sex of a single person is known and/or can be reasonably inferred from evidence. In those cases, the journalist must refer to the person using the sex-appropriate third person pronouns.
If a ‘person’ has a penis he is a man and must be referred to as a man, using masculine pronouns.
Example:
“A statement has been issued after photos of a man appearing to indecently expose himself in a Nottingham designer shop caused rage on social media. The censored pictures have been widely shared on social media, depicting a man seemingly exposing his private parts in public.”
tigger:
Perzackly.
He exposes his penis in these locations certain that his TRA buddies will cover for him. He obviously isn’t worried about adding yet another contradiction to the claim that “This Never Happens.”
Nor is he worried about being thrown roughly out of House of Fraser, or arrested and prosecuted for indecent exposure. He’s a very confident sort of fella.
@tigger,
But then you’ll be accused of bigotry and transphobia (been there, bought the taffy).
@Ophelia,
He certainly seems very proud, nay smug, in those pictures.
Indeed. The smugness is overpowering.
Sooo… who is taking those pictures? That’s a team effort, surely?
Has to be…unless of course it’s a miracle.
Someone shared a video of that person, and there’s so little motion that it’s probably a tripod. I hope so, in any case.
Ugh. Bad enough to think of a pair of perverts sneaking around the store, trying to find a quiet corner and a moment when nobody is looking. The idea that he’s blatantly setting up a photo shoot is vile.
The most this guy did in these stores was flash the sheer underwear he had on. I saw the flickr pictures before everything was deleted and before the censored pictures flooded social media. There was never any dick and balls flashing OUTSIDE of the sheer underware but this shit was definitely not cool.