They probably realized that “people who can get pregnant” would exclude post-menopausal women legislators, and “people who can or at one point in their lives could have gotten pregnant” was too awkward even for them.
Now you mention it, it does look like a man. I suppose it could be a masculine woman. Nah, easier to assume that they want to bring men into it because after all men’s needs are important, as any real feminist knows. Especially men masquerading as women.
In other words, they know which sex gets pregnant.
Maybe they lost their inclusiveness decoder ring?
They might very well say that Admiral Levine qualifies. That could be him in their recently revamped logo…
They probably realized that “people who can get pregnant” would exclude post-menopausal women legislators, and “people who can or at one point in their lives could have gotten pregnant” was too awkward even for them.
@2 That logo change is so mystifying. I mean, it’s obvious that they’ve put a man in there.
Looks like George Washington… considering how much that lot tends to hate the “founding fathers” (blech, hate that term) they may want to reconsider.
Now you mention it, it does look like a man. I suppose it could be a masculine woman. Nah, easier to assume that they want to bring men into it because after all men’s needs are important, as any real feminist knows. Especially men masquerading as women.