Women litter less
What do you know, sometimes Scientific American does remember that men are not women and vice versa.
Women have long surpassed men in the arena of environmental action; across age groups and countries, females tend to live a more eco-friendly lifestyle. Compared to men, women litter less, recycle more, and leave a smaller carbon footprint. Some researchers have suggested that personality differences, such as women’s prioritization of altruism, may help to explain this gender gap in green behavior.
Or to put it more crudely, lots of men are of the “you can’t tell me what to do” mindset even in contexts where yes of course someone can tell you what to do, while women are better at accepting that living in society entails some rules. Lots of men dread being called a pussy more than anything else, while women know selfish behavior when they see it.
Our own research suggests an additional possibility: men may shun eco-friendly behavior because of what it conveys about their masculinity. It’s not that men don’t care about the environment. But they also tend to want to feel macho, and they worry that eco-friendly behaviors might brand them as feminine.
Those are closely-related things. Altruism isn’t seen as “masculine.” It could be, but it isn’t. Wanting to feel macho=altruism is for bitches=I can do whatever I want.
Ironically, although men are often considered to be less sensitive than women, they seem to be particularly sensitive when it comes to perceptions of their gender identity. In fact, a previous study suggests that men find it to be more difficult than women to choose between masculine and feminine versions of everyday food and household items and will usually change their preferences to be more manly when allowed time to think about their decisions. Something as simple as holding a purse, ordering a colorful drink, or talking in a high voice can lead to social harm, so men tend to keep a sharp eye out for any of these potential snares.
It’s something women don’t have to deal with, at least not as directly. We’re already in the disgraced category, so it’s pointless to be hyper-vigilant about markers of it; men on the other hand have their higher status to protect.
Having said that though, I have to admit that there are lot of girly-marked things that I dislike, so maybe I’m just as hyper-vigilant even though it’s futile.
It’s an interesting and depressing conundrum. I’ve been thinking about it since forever and still have no idea how to resolve it. We’re sexually dimorphic, men are stronger, ergo there is status anxiety, always.
H/t Omar
not hyper vigilant? Nah. maybe you are really a trans man? bwahahahaha
Happy New Year!
Maybe!!
Trouble is there are also plenty of girly-marked things I love, so ???????
Gender is soooooooooooo confusing.
Only tangentially related, but when I was young, many restaurants in Norway would not serve beer to women in half liter glasses. They had to make do with quarter liter glasses. I suspect they’d rather that women did not drink beer at all, but stay with more ladylike drinks. Sweet and colourful. None of my female friends would accept this, of course. We just went elsewhere. Also, I was once refused service at a restaurant because I had long hair. Amazing how things change in fifty years …
Oh, and this:
Except protecting women, especially from other men, is considered a masculine virtue, is it not? That seems like a sort of altruism to me.
@3 I still remember the days when it was a challenge, if not downright impossible, to get the person behind the counter in an Irish pub to pull a pint of beer (rather than a half pint) for a woman. There was a lot of social pressure against women drinking pints in Ireland–but I managed to change my male colleagues’ perspective when I pointed out how unreasonable it was for me to have to get up and go to the bar twice as often as them. And from then on I would hear ‘pint of Guinness for the lady!’ whenever I walked into one of my local pubs….
Harald – yes that’s true, and in fact men are expected to be protective in a whole lot of ways, like the tiny matter of going to war.
As long as going to war is a defensive position and not an offensive one, then we’re back to aggressive male behavior (gives Pootie the bird)…
Guest @5 – Good for you! I don’t know about Ireland, but in Norway, at least, two quarter liters of beer cost considerably more than one half liter. And beer here is expensive in the first place, compared to Ireland (or most places)!
Susan Faludi’s book Stiffed is good on this subject–she starts it by pointing out that the purpose of both traditionally ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ traits and characteristics is to protect and support the next generation.
Ophelia @6
After the king’s new year’s speech today on national, as always they played the national anthem afterwards. And one bit struck me (remember that this was written more than a hundred years ago), in the seventh verse: “Alt, hva fedrene har kjempet, mødrene har grett” – unofficial translation courtesy of wikipedia: “All the fights fathers have fought, and the mothers have wept”. Here, at least one aspect of gender rôles at the time are clearly laid out: Men fight, women weep.
(The wikipedia translation of the Norwegian national anthem is actually quite awful. As it says, it is indeed quite literal, with some extra verbiage added, totally lacking in any poetic qualities of the original. Read at your own risk.)
The covid-related issue of ‘antivaxxerism’ is also relevant here; along the macho lines of the memorable ad campaign some years back of “Us Tareyton smokers would rather fight than switch” which was the caption underneath a picture of a bloke with a black eye and a Tareyton cigarette hanging out of his gob.
The antivaxxers in my experience tend to be rather markedly from the political Right (eg Trump vs Fauci) and frame the issue as being all about (their own) personal ‘freedom.’ Yet paradoxically, they do not claim the ‘freedom’ to drive on whichever side of the road they please, and tend to accept that law; though it is still commonly broken by late-night drivers evidently and presumably of our male persuasion who like to oblige by leaving plenty of rubber on the road so that it is easier for people to see where they have been: in their commonly high-powered and raucous bullshit machines.
But normally, driving on the wrong side of the road could cause rapid and serious alterations and rearrangements to be made to the said machines. So they (however grudgingly) accept it as being for their OWN good. Otherwise, it would be self-delusion, and pitiful to see.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/aug/08/rightwing-radio-host-dick-farrel-anti-vaxxer-dies-covid
#4 Harald
Property protection. Get your own woman, this one is mine sort of thing.
Well, now I’m worried that I can’t tell the difference between masculine and feminine everyday food items. Toast is gender neutral, surely?