Trans golfer
Same old smoke and mirrors:
Trans golfer sparks outrage as she attempts to qualify for ladies PGA tour
Outrage why? Because the golfer is not a “she.” Lying in the headline is not a good look for a newspaper.
A Scottish golfer who is attempting to qualify for the ladies’ PGA tour has sparked a fresh row over whether transgender athletes should compete in women’s events.
The row is over whether men should compete in women’s events.
Hailey Davidson, who became the first trans golfer to win a professional tournament last year, is trying to earn a Ladies Professional Gold Association (LPGA) tour card.
If successful, Davidson will become the first trans golfer to earn the card.
He’s not a “trans golfer,” he’s a trans woman, i.e. a man. Because he’s a man, he shouldn’t be competing against women. It isn’t fair.
Davidson began hormone therapy in 2015 and has undergone gender reassignment surgery. Before the therapy, the golfer competed as a male.
No he didn’t “compete as a male,” he simply was a male, and still is. He competed against other men.
And while some have accused her of having an unfair advantage against other female competitors, Davidson claims that some of her rivals can hit the ball further after she lost 30 yards from her drive after undergoing therapy.
Oh just stop. Stop trying to cheat. Have some dignity, along with a sense of fairness.
Davidson has previously claimed that the outrage is “not about protecting women’s sports or me having an advantage, it’s just that you don’t like trans people.”
It’s that we don’t like men invading women’s sports. Get out of it.
A trans golfer? So he was assigned footballer at birth?
But he obviously got nowhere in that competition. So, in order to give himself a chance of winning, he swallowed a few courses of medication, had his donger and balls amputated, and dressed himself up in womens’ clothes. As one does, if fixated on winning; at golf.
Alternatively, he could have taken up tiddleywinks or some other sport where what sex you are is irrelevant.
Do we know this? Lots of trans-identified men are doing without “bottom surgery”; FPFW says “the vast majority” in their article on the topic.
So, possibly even less commitment than you suggest.
Sackbut, I was going by:
in the threadstarter.