Their stories have upended his assumptions

It’s like being tangled in a net that just pulls tighter the more you struggle.

Reuters has a special report on detransitioners.

For years, Dr Kinnon MacKinnon, like many people in the transgender community, considered the word “regret” to be taboo.

MacKinnon, a 37-year-old transgender man and assistant professor of social work at York University here, thought it was offensive to talk about people who transitioned, later regretted their decision, and detransitioned. They were too few in number, he figured, and any attention they got reinforced to the public the false impression that transgender people were incapable of making sound decisions about their treatment.

But what if it’s not a false impression? What if it’s not high quality thinking to assume in advance that it is a false impression? What of the (surely very real) possibility that in a climate of feverish noisy nonstop affirmation of the claim that people can be “in the wrong body,” many or most transgender people really are unable to make sound decisions about their treatment? What if they’re unable to make sound decisions because of the intensity and fervor of all the affirmation and the bullying of dissenters? And caught in a spiral they can’t get out of because of this very belief that it’s a “false impression” and “offensive to talk about”? Why didn’t any of that occur to MacKinnon for years?

Anyway, he decided to do some research on the subject.

In the past year, MacKinnon and his team of researchers have talked to 40 detransitioners in the United States, Canada and Europe, many of them having first received gender-affirming medical treatment in their 20s or younger. Their stories have upended his assumptions.

Many have said their gender identity remained fluid well after the start of treatment, and a third of them expressed regret about their decision to transition from the gender they were assigned at birth. Some said they avoided telling their doctors about detransitioning out of embarrassment or shame. Others said their doctors were ill-equipped to help them with the process. Most often, they talked about how transitioning did not address their mental health problems.

It’s so sad.

In his continuing search for detransitioners, MacKinnon spent hours scrolling through TikTok and sifting through online forums where people shared their experiences and found comfort from each other. These forays opened his eyes to the online abuse detransitioners receive – not just the usual anti-transgender attacks, but members of the transgender community telling them to “shut up” and even sending death threats.

It’s interesting that even here, in a special report on detransitioners, there’s room for a snipe at “the usual anti-transgender attacks” – as if critics were just shouting at people for fun as opposed to pointing out what a catastrophic mess this new ideology really is.

The stories [MacKinnon] heard convinced him that doctors need to provide detransitioners the same supportive care they give to young people to transition, and that they need to inform their patients, especially minors, that detransitioning can occur because gender identity may change. A few months ago, he decided to organize a symposium to share his findings and new perspective with other researchers, clinicians, and patients and their families.

You know how that went.

A Canadian health provider said it couldn’t participate, citing recent threats to hospitals offering youth gender care. An LGBTQ advocacy group refused to promote the event. MacKinnon declined to identify either, telling Reuters he didn’t want to single them out. Later, after he shared his findings on Twitter, a transgender person denounced his work as “transphobia.”

Around and around we go, caught in the circle. Claims of “transphobia” keep people from getting good advice, and then when they want to reverse the process, the claims of “transphobia” catch up to them anyway.

In the world of gender-affirming care, as well as in the broader transgender community, few words cause more discomfort and outright anger than “detransition” and “regret.” That’s particularly true among medical practitioners in the United States and other countries who provide treatment to rising numbers of minors seeking to transition.

Except it’s not “treatment,” is it – not as commonly understood. It’s a very new very drastic intervention, that mutilates healthy bodies in an effort to make them match reported (but entirely untestable) “gender identities.” I don’t think “treatment” is the right word for that.

 When someone does detransition, they say, it’s almost never because of regret, but rather, a response to the hardship of living in a society where transphobia still runs rampant.

Is it? Or is it a response to the hardship of coming to understand that they trashed their bodies for a mistake?

Doctors and many transgender people say that focusing on isolated cases of detransitioning and regret endangers hard-won gains for broader recognition of transgender identity and a rapid increase in the availability of gender care that has helped thousands of minors.

Yes but that’s just it. This “rapid increase in the availability of gender care” is a fad for a new and bizarre ideology, and it could well be that everyone will end up regretting it. The rapid increase is horrifying and scary.

To be continued.

H/t CB.

11 Responses to “Their stories have upended his assumptions”