Stripes
The Beeb reports on the suffragette scarf exclusion zone:
The Scottish Parliament’s presiding officer has apologised after a woman was ejected from a committee meeting for refusing to remove a scarf in suffragette colours.
The woman was asked to leave a session of the equalities committee, which was discussing proposed reforms to Scotland’s gender recognition laws.
Sorry sorry sorry it was all a mistake. We haven’t yet made it illegal to mention the suffrage campaign.
The colours have been associated with the suffragette movement, which campaigned for women to be given the right to vote in the early 20th century. More recently, they have also become associated with those opposed to changes to gender recognition laws.
You mean those opposed to the total displacement and erasure of women.
SNP MP Joanna Chery – a vocal critic of the gender reforms – tweeted that the removal of the woman was a “disgraceful episode for Scottish democracy”, adding: “This is not the Scotland I entered politics to promote.
“It’s completely out of step with what the suffragettes fought for, the spirit of the enlightenment and indeed the founding principles of the Scottish Parliament”.
They’ll know better next time. They’ll prevent such women from getting in the door.
I have the suffrage colors hanging in my office; in fact, it is a ribbon that includes the words “Votes for Women”, in case anyone doesn’t understand. Guess it’s a good thing I’m not in Scotland?
I may move it from my office to the door outside my office so everyone can see it.
It makes one wonder how many other officials and officers with the Scottish government feel it is incumbent upon them to police women in this way. How much of the machinery of government has been reprogrammed to automatically, unquestioningly defend the gender virus that has invaded it? Some Americans are concerned with courts “legislating from the bench.” Well in Scotland, they’ve skipped all that; trans-activism’s extra-legal infiltration has reached down to the committee level, so we have “legislation from the security guard.” How much of this shit has gone on that we don’t know about, that has not been commented upon publicly? If they get away with it, it becomes, de facto, the new standard, benchmark, and beach-head.
Ratchet, ratchet, ratchet. Another inch of ground stolen. Silence means consent. Particularly when the theft is quiet and secret, behind closed doors where it’s meant to be.
“We’ve been using women’s toilets for years! You can’t stop us now!”
You can’t stop us now!
You can’t stop us now!.
Now, you can’t stop us!
Each equally gloaty and threatening.
But remember, be kind!
[…] a comment by Your Name’s not Bruce? on […]