Make that GENDER discrimination
Erin Friday on the move to change Title IX at the expense of women and girls:
While U.S. citizens, and particularly women and parents, should be celebrating the golden jubilee of Title IX, marking 50 years of protection against sex discrimination, they are instead feverishly trying to stop the Biden administration from implementing sweeping changes to the 1972 federal civil rights law. The proposed regulations undermine the initial premise of Title IX, prohibiting sex discrimination in educational programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. These regulations will chill speech and enshrine gender identity as a reality…
When reality, oddly enough, is the very thing it isn’t.
Imagine changing federal laws to enshrine other fantasies. Affirmative action for white people who identify as black! Protections for people who were born here to people who were born here but identify as immigrants! Federal scholarships for Wasps who identify as first nations! Stipends for billionaires who identify as penniless!
On Sept. 12, 2022, the Department of Education will close public comments to its Notice of Proposal Rulemaking, a 700-page document rife with inconsistencies and double-speak. Essentially, the executive branch will promulgate new law expanding discrimination protections based on sex to include gender identity and sexual orientation. Notably, none of these terms are defined, resulting in incomprehensible regulations that guarantee a barrage of lawsuits from both sides of the aisle. Few students, from preschool to graduate school, will be immune to the deleterious effects of these regulations should they be enacted.
But on the plus side, there will be more and more and more precious gender angels everywhere.
Well, we don’t have to wonder about Vice President (she/her)’s position on this. :P
The proposed amendments to Title IX never define “gender identity.”
Here’s the definition from the Equality Act:” the gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms, or other gender-related characteristics of an individual, regardless of the individual’s designated sex at birth.”
So, it’s looking like a girl, swishing your hips, talking with your hands, tilting your head — that sort of thing. I guess. I would have expected a legal document to provide a better definition, but at least they tried.
None of the other proposed protected characteristics — sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, sexual orientation, and pregnancy — are “consistent or inconsistent” with sex when it comes to distinguishing the sexes for single sex spaces or reserves. Not so with “gender identity,” which is a rival for sex. These forced pairings are getting tedious.
[…] This comment of Sastra’s sent me to the source to get the full context. […]